My weekly preamble is in spoiler tags below.
preamble
For the weekend of August 1-2, Trump had once again promised major strikes on Iran, which would have included crossing the critical red line of striking their energy infrastructure. In response, Iran once again essentially promised to end the possibility of modern civilization as we know it throughout much of the Gulf States and, to a certain extent, the Zionist entity, with the economic impacts radiating outwards around the world from there. The frustrating part about these threats from Trump is that while he’s reneged on them before, the consequences of them actually occurring are so dire that it’s difficult to ignore them; rolling a dice with even a 5% chance for complete catastrophe will always be nerve-wracking.
Anyway, as we all know, these strikes did not occur, with the excuse this time being much the same as the previous times: our regional allies begged us not to (potentially true) and Iran called us and said they were willing to negotiate/surrender (untrue). The point of these threat displays is at least twofold: first, to see if Iran is genuinely going to flinch, or, at least, if internal elements that may or may not exist will be spooked into action against the IRGC; and second, to manipulate oil prices downwards by creating constant cycles of “relief” out of an otherwise relatively constant downward trend as Hormuz stays closed and oil reserves continue to ebb. I do say “relatively”, of course, given that Ansarallah now appears to be delivering a boot up the ass of Saudi Arabia by taking offline quite a lot of its refinery infrastructure.
It is into this situation that Ukraine seems to want in. For those out of the loop, the situation over in Ukraine has largely the same overall attritional dynamics as previous years, but with a few added wrinkles. Ukraine started striking Russian infrastructure a while ago, and while their effectiveness is hotly debated and I don’t want to dismiss them as totally ineffectual, it’s clear that the psychological effects - such as they are - are greater than the material effects. Russia’s retaliation strikes have been considerably more impactful, including strikes on Ukrainian Black Sea ports and vessels, and a campaign explicitly against gas stations across Ukraine, as well as some rather impressive and disruptive explosions at Ukrainian military fairs and production sites. Zelensky has admitted publicly that they are now basically out of Patriot missiles and that Russian missiles are now landing entirely unopposed (beforehand, they were just landing largely unopposed, given the lackluster performance of Western air defences in general). He seems to have considered a possible way out: linking together the Ukraine and Iran Wars to a united front against Russia and Iran, which would then grant Ukraine more munitions to keep fighting on.
Now, for all the fear I’ve seen of this occurring (and, don’t get me wrong, the US and Russia being in non-proxy, direct conflict is a genuinely frightening prospect for continued life on Earth) how linking together two wars which the West is quite decisively losing into a single war would help at all is beyond me. At this moment, at least, US military planners appear to agree with me. Ukraine hit a Caspian Sea vessel going to Iran a while ago, but then seems to have quickly apologised after being given a stern talking to by the US. This shows just how willing the US is to grant Ukraine more aid, as their own interceptor stockpile is running very low due to Iranian strikes. One would almost feel sympathy for Zelensky if is wasn’t for… well, everything that’s happened. The path of Ngô Đình Diệm is a tough one to walk.
Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on the Zionists’ destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Trump’s plan for Venezuelan oil has failed. Seven months after major US oil companies were called upon by the White House to invest $100 billion in Venezuelan oil exploration, only two drilling rigs are active, the same number as before the US intervention. US oil companies refuse to invest heavily in extracting Venezuelan oil, which is heavy and economically unviable compared to oil from other locations, such as the Gulf or the state of Texas, for example.
Thus, even possessing the world’s largest oil reserves, Venezuela has not attracted as much investment as Trump imagined it would after his intervention in the South American country. In addition to the high extraction cost itself, Venezuelan heavy oil is more difficult to refine, requiring specific facilities for this type of oil in refineries, an operation that would demand large-scale investments. Even with oil prices at record highs, it remains cheaper to produce and refine oil from other sources, such as the Gulf, Texas, the North Sea, and even Brazil’s pre-salt reserves, which have finer and higher-quality oil compared to Venezuelan oil. - Wall Street Journal
https://nitter.net/The_Aftershock_/status/2086351877575201077
People Against Genocide broke into the Aberdeen facility of Ultra I&C, a supplier to Elbit Systems and the Israeli military.
The action takers destroyed equipment, recorded documents and barricaded themselves inside.
They are currently still inside the plant.
Even the conservatives are starting to get cold feat on AUKUS (military alliance where Australia pays tribute to the usa and gets a promise that they’ll consider giving submarines).
Turnbull [ex PM, conservative but intellectual] went on:
The prospect of the US doubling its rate of Virginia production in the next six years is highly unlikely. So there is a very real risk Australia gets no Virginias at all.
This risk is acknowledged everywhere but in Canberra. There is apparently a view that if anyone were to openly contemplate a Plan B (what to do if no submarines arrive) this might discourage the Americans from selling us any.
Emphasising he remained a supporter of Australia’s security alliance with the US, Turnbull argued Aukus had diminished Australian sovereignty.
We have effectively ceded control of a Western Australian naval base to the US Navy. Whether we get any nuclear powered submarines will depend on political decisions in Washington and industrial developments in the US and the UK.
It is naive to imagine that the submarines, if ever acquired, could be used other than in accordance with American wishes.
Will Aukus enhance our security or will it simply draw Australia into a conflict with China whether we like it or not?
from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hcOh5H3a0KM the ongoing public enquiry
The usa continues to aggressively undermine their own imperial machinery by one sided dealing lmao
What are the best personal video resources on the DPRK?
Vaga Vagabond got good footage (Russian privileges) but is a satanically racist hack
Zoe Discovers is principled but she is only allowed into the country for the Pyongyang Marathon and she hasn’t been back in the country for over a year
US Army Delta Force soldiers are allegedly operating undercover in Brazil to supposedly plan a future operation to kidnap President Lula. The allegation was made on August 9, 2026, by candidate for federal deputy Jeffrey Chiquini.
Brazil will begin issuing public debt in Chinese yuan, increasing financing diversification and promoting a sovereign yield curve in yuan in the Chinese market, taking advantage of more attractive rates than those currently practiced in reais, dollars, and euros.
Argentinians are returning to bartering, exchanging goods just as humanity did before civilization and during the feudal period. The disaster of Milei’s neoliberalism devalued the peso so much that even Argentinians don’t want to use their own currency.
The UK Ministry of Culture is poised to ban the Russian children’s cartoon “Masha and the Bear,” accusing the program of being a propaganda tool for the Russian government. At least 50 British MPs have signed a petition to ban the animation in the UK. - Kuwait Times
Motivated to destabilize South America, driven by Trump’s “Shield of the Americas,” Paraguayans are proposing the construction of a wall to separate Paraguay from Brazil, in addition to adopting hostile stances against Brazilian sovereignty and accusing Brazil of “imperialism.”
Looks like another tanker went byebye.
Drones were shot down in Sirik, Iran. No reported impacts yet. Sirik is also where the missiles that hit the tanker in SoH were reportedly fired from.
A Saudi drone was reportedly shot down by Iranian air defence over the city of Sirik, southern Iran. According to unconfirmed reports, a second drone was intercepted in the same area a short time ago.
https://x.com/AMK_Mapping_/status/2086568098405175496
[edit] Maybe the new guy is already having an effect!
Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has formally appointed former longtime IRGC commander-in-chief Mohsen Rezaei as the head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.
Houthi attack on Yemeni port of Mocha leaves seven dead - Prensa Latina
Article
Sanaa, Aug 9 (Prensa Latina) Seven people were killed and about 35 were wounded today in an attack by the Houthis against the port of Mocha and residential areas of that western Yemeni city, government sources reported.
The attack hit port facilities and nearby neighborhoods in Mocha, in the Taiz governorate and close to the strategic Bab al-Mandeb strait.
Media outlets linked to the Yemeni government cited medical sources who initially placed the number of dead at seven and the number of wounded at around 35.
Hours earlier, Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree claimed responsibility for an operation using ballistic missiles and drones against what he described as Saudi troop concentrations and weapons depots in the Mocha area.
Saree claimed that the attacks achieved their objectives and caused human and material losses, although those claims could not be independently verified.
For his part, the director of the port of Mocha, Abdul Malik al-Sharabi, reported that the offensive caused damage to civilian facilities and left workers injured.
The port of Mocha is located in an area under the control of forces aligned with the internationally recognized Yemeni government and constitutes a strategic facility due to its proximity to Bab al-Mandeb, one of the main maritime routes between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
The new attack comes amid escalating fighting in Yemen and Houthi operations against Saudi interests and maritime routes in the region.
In recent days, the Houthis also claimed responsibility for attacks against Saudi Arabian oil targets and vessels linked to that country, while Riyadh responded with military operations against positions of the movement in Yemeni territory.
The intensification of hostilities raises concerns about a larger-scale reactivation of the Yemeni conflict, following the period of relative calm that followed the UN-brokered truce in 2022.
Iran says dialogue with Oman over Hormuz enters final phase - Prensa Latina
Article
Tehran, Aug 9 (Prensa Latina) Negotiations between Iran and Oman on new mechanisms for commercial navigation through the Strait of Hormuz have entered their final stage and an agreement could be reached soon, Iranian sources said today.
Fada Hossein Maleki, a member of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, noted that the talks are being held bilaterally between Tehran and Muscat and are focused on the use and management of this strategic maritime route.
The legislator argued that the United States is attempting to enter the process as a third party, although Iranian authorities insist that the negotiations are solely between Iran and Oman, as they are the two states bordering the strait. This position aligns with recent statements from the Iranian Foreign Ministry.
Maleki stated that the talks are close to an agreement and assured that Tehran intends to preserve its participation in the control and management of maritime traffic once the new mechanisms are implemented.
The Iranian Foreign Ministry reported this week that both countries are working on a joint declaration based on the main points agreed during the negotiations.
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs Kazem Gharibabadi also confirmed that the agreement is nearing its final stage and specified that it will establish new procedures for the movement of commercial vessels.
Iranian authorities clarified, however, that any eventual agreement with Oman would not automatically entail a complete reopening of the strait under the same conditions that existed before the recent regional escalation.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei explained that the consultations aim to establish safe corridors for commercial navigation while simultaneously protecting the security interests and sovereign rights of the two coastal countries.
Tehran and Muscat have been holding political, technical and legal talks for nearly two months on maritime transit through Hormuz, whose security has become more important after the recent military clashes in the region.
The strait is one of the most important routes for the international transport of hydrocarbons and connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Indian Ocean, so any prolonged disruption of its traffic has repercussions on energy markets and world trade.
French Presidential elections: Hollande’s revenge? - Prensa Latina
Article
Paris, August 9 (Prensa Latina) Former President François Hollande is threatening today to run in the 2027 presidential elections, in a kind of revenge for what happened a decade ago when Emmanuel Macron left his government and won the elections.
According to the newspaper Le Monde, Macron’s “betrayal,” whom Hollande appointed as Minister of Economy in 2014, was his decision to leave the government in 2016 to create the En Marche party and run with it in the 2017 elections.
Macron defeated the socialist candidate Benoît Hamon at that time, the newspaper recalls.
The publication comments that the return of the experienced socialist politician causes a reaction ranging from sarcastic and unbelievable to worrying, especially when it comes to an atomized center-right.
Among Macron supporters, Édouard Philippe is the best positioned, with almost 20 percent of the voting intentions, while the young president of Renaissance (Macron’s party), Gabriel Attal, has 15.
HOLLANDE’S STRATEGY
One of Hollande’s tools would be waiting, because although he has hinted in different ways at his intention to fight again for the Élysée Palace, he still maintains his phrase “I am preparing myself”.
Experts from the CNews channel believe that the Socialist Party’s (PS) proposal to hold primaries for the presidential elections next October is not a suitable plan for the experienced politician.
Hollande is looking for a path that can be under his control, and the primaries are far from being that, but another matter, as Le Monde comments, is turning expectation into reality.
For the moment, the possibility that the former president will run in the elections next April is worrying the French political center, as Hollande could seek to go beyond the Socialist Party and establish himself as a candidate of social democracy.
Le Monde believes this possibility opens doors among various sectors, including the center-right, although this is far from being supported by the polls.
OPTIONS FOR THE FORMER PRESIDENT
This could be due to the contradiction between Hollande’s status as the candidate with the most political experience and the history of his own time in power, when at one point he only had three percent support.
A recent experimental survey by the Elabe institute indicates that, should the socialist politician run, he would now have nine points of voting intentions.
That result would place him well below the far-right Marine Le Pen, with almost 35 percent, Philippe, with 19.5, the leader of La France Insoumise (LCI), Jean-Luc Mélenchon, with 16, and Attal, with 15.5.
However, Hollande has other options. The same polling firm placed him at 41 percent among left-wing voters, almost tied with the leader of the French Communist Party, Fabien Roussel.
Above them is François Ruffin, of the Debout party, which came from the LCI, with 45 points, and Mélenchon, with 42, but Hollande is ahead of the 40 of Raphaël Glucksmann, a progressive and pro-European social democrat.
For now, the steps taken by Hollande fall within the scheme of much of the French political class: to prevent a victory of the far right, after Macron won in the second round in 2022, with 58.55 of the votes, against Le Pen (41.45).
Former president and former foreign ministers agree with Peru-Mexico agreement - Prensa Latina
Article
Lima, Aug 8 (Prensa Latina) A former president and two former foreign ministers joined today in expressing their approval of the departure of the former Peruvian prime minister who sought asylum in Mexico, which led to the resumption of bilateral diplomatic relations.
Former foreign minister and career diplomat Óscar Maúrtua welcomed the granting of the safe-conduct pass that yesterday allowed former Prime Minister Betssy Chávez to travel to Mexico.
“International law has been respected and a good message has been sent to the international community,” he said.
He added that “the law has been respected; one cannot interpret a treaty, an international instrument that one has signed by sovereign mandate,” he said, in obvious allusion to the argument invoked by the ephemeral government of José Jerí in November 2025 to deny safe passage, claiming that Chávez had been sentenced.
He also said that the Peruvian State could have continued to deny safe passage, but that would be following a policy of disrespect for treaties that would have consequences for the country.
For his part, former neoliberal president Pedro Pablo Kuczynski (PPK) said that the best outcome has been the extension of safe passage to Chávez, since the Government has respected the Caracas Convention on asylum.
“What the critics say is that she was being tried, that she has fled, that is not what the Caracas Convention says; what it says is: someone asks for asylum, the applicant’s government must give them safe passage,” he said.
Meanwhile, former conservative foreign minister Javier Gonzalez Olaechea, politically distant from Chávez like Maúrtua and Kuczynski, ruled out the possibility of a possible extradition request for Chávez succeeding, a request which the government of Keiko Fujimori reserved the right to eventually raise.
Once a State, in accordance with the Caracas Convention on
The Diplomatic Rights of 1954 grants that safe conduct, having recognized the status of asylee as such, extradition is not warranted, he explained.
“There is no possibility of extradition, from a legal or political point of view, because it would be contrary not only to the Convention, but to the very spirit of the re-establishment of diplomatic relations between Peru and Mexico,” he said.
On the other hand, Senator Ruth Luque stated that economic factors and business pressures for the mutual reopening of embassies and consulates have influenced the reestablishment of relations with Mexico.
In this regard, economist Pablo Moreyra explains that the resumption of relations between Peru and Mexico is also due to economic and commercial factors.
He specified that during the nine months of diplomatic rupture between the two countries, trade with Mexico remained at about 2.5 billion dollars per year, with a record of Peruvian exports to the northern country of 1.036 billion dollars in 2025.
In addition, Moreyra indicated that Mexican investments total 14 billion dollars, from Grupo México in mining, América Móvil in telecommunications, and to a lesser extent Bimbo, Femsa, Mabe and Cinépolis, which makes Peru the second destination for Mexican investment in the region.
Poll shows majority approval for Peru’s new President - Prensa Latina
Article
Lima, Aug 9 (Prensa Latina) Peruvian President Keiko Fujimori is approved by 60 percent of citizens, according to the first private survey that assesses the impact of her arrival at the Government Palace less than two weeks ago.
The Datum poll indicates that the percentage is higher than the previous elected ruler, Pedro Castillo, who began his brief and turbulent term with 44 percent, although it is lower than that received by the four presidents before him.
The initial support for the president contrasts with the margin of less than one percent with which she won the presidential runoff against the progressive Roberto Sánchez and with nearly 90 percent of the voters who, in the first round of elections, did not vote for her, although the dispersion of the vote among more than 30 candidates gave her the first place with which she qualified for the decisive stage.
Datum’s director, Urpi Torrado, argued that the majority approval shows that “even among those who did not vote for her there seems to be a certain willingness to first observe the results of her administration” and highlighted that 62 percent expressed optimism for the future of the country.
On the other hand, the poll anointed former presidential candidate Sánchez as the leader of the opposition made up of his party Together for Peru and the centrist parties Good Government Party, Now Nation and Works.
Torrado noted, on the other hand, that “historically the beginning of a term is usually accompanied by a dose of optimism and an initial period of confidence.”
“Sixty percent represents a good starting point, but also a responsibility. Citizens tend to be pragmatic, and initial trust will depend on the results they perceive in the coming months,” he added.
He also said that the Datum poll showed that almost half of those surveyed predict a confrontational relationship between the Executive and Congress.
The four opposition groups, although not unanimous, have a large majority in the Chamber of Deputies and half of the seats in the Senate, while the other half is in the hands of the ruling party, Fuerza Popular, and its ally, Renovación Popular, of the extreme right.
On the other hand, on the day of the first poll on his term, he reaffirmed his main campaign promise, that of restoring order in the face of rampant crime, and praised seven police officers for the capture of a group of hitmen.





