Capital city of Idaho
Podcaster owns their means of production, thus they are petit bourgeoisie. Person hiring labor to produce commodity is bourgeoisie, person having to sell their labor is proletariat. Police and criminals are lumpenproletariat.
Literally just making shit up 
https://xcancel.com/BenjaminNorton/status/2020374975975481471
More than 95% of unpaid fees owed to the UN are owed by the US.
Sick pedo who’s unfortunately still alive denies ever meeting other sick pedo who’s fortunately dead:
https://xcancel.com/DalaiLama/status/2020350986683052473
I guess holding them up to the standards set by the Soviet Union’s ideological commitments in foreign policy is asking too much despite the former having achieved far bigger financial and productive dominance.
The PRC does not have military dominance compared with the SU. The SU during the 60s had more nukes than the PRC has right now in 2026. You can’t have a SU foreign policy without a SU military to back up that policy, and what the PLA currently has right now doesn’t cut it (although that will change very soon).
The entire Warsaw Pact had 69k tanks ready to drive west and push the Atlanticist bourgeoisie straight to the Atlantic they love so much. The PLA does not have 69k tanks. The PLA doesn’t even have a nuclear powered aircraft carrier.
Between this and him purging generals for being doves right after discussions about the PRC needing to be more militarily assertive, Xi is obviously a newshead.
“I will steer the airplane into a collision course with the White House.”
Niger’s military leader has accused the presidents of France, Benin, and the Ivory Coast of backing armed groups behind an overnight attack on an Air Force base in the capital, Niamey, that wounded four soldiers and damaged an aircraft.
State television also claimed that one of the attackers killed was a French national. No group has claimed responsibility for the assault.
What would any communist do: resist with every mean possible, while building new power.
Unironic “unlike Hitler, I would’ve simply taken Stalingrad” with communist characteristics
The size of the C-5 reminds me of custom SC2 campaigns where the capital ship would be bigger than the entire screen to make it more lore accurate.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb04624.x?sid=nlm%3Apubmed
The incidence of skin-tested sensitivity to olive pollen allergens among subjects with suspected atopic respiratory allergy was investigated in various populations of Israelis. This incidence was correlated with the olive cultivars, with the abundance of trees in the patients’ neighborhoods, and with the history of exposure of the studied populations to olive pollen. Positive skin reactions to olive pollen, among atopic patients of the Jewish population, is rather high where olive trees are abundant (66%), and lower (29%) where trees are scarce (P<0.003). Sensitization was significantly lower (P< 0.003) among a population of Israeli atopic Arabs (16%), though these Arabs have lived in an olive-rich area for several generations.
There are three parties in the ROC: the DPP, the KMT, and the TPP. The DPP are the separatist party and currently in power, the KMT are pro-status quo and the TPP are mostly agnostic between separatism vs status quo. On paper, the TPP should be ideologically closer to the DPP, but since the DPP has been trying to jail the chairman of the TPP on trumped up charges, the KMT and the TPP are in coalition.
The KMT has its origins in the Chinese Civil War although it has gone through multiple iterations to the point where the modern KMT has nothing in common with Sun Yat-sen’s KMT or Chiang Kai-shek’s KMT for that matter. The DPP only officially existed after the end of martial law and liberalization during the 90s. The TPP is the new kid on the block having only been founded in 2019.
Galula
Galula mentioned.
VULNERABILITY OF THE INSURGENT IN THE SHORTCUT PATTERN
In the case when the insurgent has chosen to follow the bourgeois-nationalist pattern, his vulnerability starts from a lower level since his action is clandestine at the outset. It climbs rapidly because of the danger inherent in terrorism, which the normal police force may be able to suppress if it has not been planned and conducted on a sufficient scale. The insurgent, who needs publicity above everything else at this stage, is also at the mercy of a tight and prompt censorship.
However, surprise plays in his favor, and he can count on the fact that the counterinsurgent’s reaction is never immediate. If the insurgent has survived the first few days of blind terrorism, his vulnerability decreases.
It soon rises again because the full power of the counterinsurgent begins to be mobilized against him; the armed forces, particularly, go into action much sooner than in the orthodox pattern. Vulnerability goes up to a new height. If the insurgent survives, it diminishes progressively.
When the insurgent reaches Step 3 (guerrilla warfare) and rejoins the orthodox pattern, he is less vulnerable than he would have been had he chosen the orthodox pattern at the start because he has already successfully withstood the full brunt of the counterinsurgent reaction.
I don’t see how that tracks. They themselves have mentioned that English isn’t their first language
Like it or not, I’ve seen my ESL coworkers use AI to write out their emails. Critical support because it’s a world-historic injustice for people to be forced to learn English.
Look at what happened after the collapse of the USSR - 70 years of institutions simply went down the drain, and the society reverted to its past, reactionary form, just like that.
This is not remotely true. The RF, as reactionary as it is, isn’t a past reactionary form but a new reactionary form distinct from its tsardom past, which makes sense since the tsardom and the federation have different modes of production. Orthodoxy, autocracy, and nationality isn’t the guiding ideology of the Russian state no matter how much Westerners try to paint Putin as a new tsar. The current Russian state cherrypicks the highlight reel moments of its distant feudal past and much less distant socialist past, but it’s still fundamentally a liberal state with a liberal ideology. And the fact that it cherrypicks its nonliberal history in order to form a highlight reel exposes an insecurity with the state: the liberal state is a young state that hasn’t accomplished a whole lot in the grand scheme of things.
47% of its population is Hispanic/Latino.
That’s the reason. Too many POC who won’t let ICE goons kidnap their family and friends without putting up a fight.
It’s just a Western rag spreading FUD.
Literally everything Shipwreck said about bureaucracy in the PRC can apply to bureaucracy in every single state society of every single historical epoch. “Bureaucracy sucks because people with close ties to bureaucrats can leverage their connections to gain status, wealth, and power.” Cool, but what does this has to do specifically with the PRC?
Is the PRC actually more plagued by bureaucracy than say India, a country located on the same continent with a slightly larger population, and a similiarish trajectory in history?
This has the same exact energy as those IOF losers crying how they can’t sleep without pissing on themselves because Hamas gave them PTSD.
People having a struggle session over shit from Bloomberg