• Ajen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Rage bait. Yes, the app is creepy, but the first actual quote the article gives is in this paragraph:

    And then there’s the phrase. Post after post across the app uses some version of the same line: “he collects women like Pokémon cards.”

    None of the quotes truly support the headline, imo.

    Also, that app is creepy af and should probably be illegal on privacy grounds.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, that part really shows the entire methodology of the article is bullshit.

      And then there’s the phrase. Post after post across the app uses some version of the same line: “he collects women like Pokémon cards.” That’s not a joke somebody made once. That’s the app’s house insult, used so often it might as well ship with the keyboard. The man on the receiving end doesn’t even have to play. You could have never touched a card in your life and still catch this one.

      They’re proving that this instance of a negative mention of Pokemon doesn’t even have to do with someone being interested in the hobby which is the entire premise of the article. But they never mention filtering for this, and then just go on to say that liking Pokemon is the worst hobby stats wise. Not that I’m expecting perfect methodology for something like this, but this is a pretty fucking glaring issue they even openly admit but somehow don’t see the problem with it.

      Saying someone collects women like Pokemon cards is just an insult about someone being a player, it doesn’t have anything to do with someone’s hobbies. It could easily be said as collecting women like any other commonly collected item.

  • Cypher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    The data these women are spilling on men is outrageous, they’re putting up full names, birthdays, photos that often identify addresses and making claims that are straight up defamatory.

    It needs to be shut down as the users have no right to be sharing others information in this way.

    Before anyone throws around accusations I’m married and I’m not featured on this disgusting app.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If men did the same thing to women, people would have a much different reaction.

      And I get that sexism makes it completely reasonable for women to act differently and/or defend themselves but that’s not what this is.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Imagine this app existing for the opposite sex.

    How is this even implemented? How do you keep a certain sex off of the app? Especially trans people, what do they do with them? And non-binary people too.

    • BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      They require video or id confirmation. It’s creepy as hell. Either a “video selfie” or give photo id

  • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t care. Why would you want to be with a woman who isn’t accepting of pop culture?

    Even grandmas play Pokemon Go GTFO of here.

  • dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Type of girl that uses this app is not one im interested in, none of my friends do, their tea app is their gcs and it’s prob more effective

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m old so maybe not relevant, but I think all those dating apps are stupid.

      One, the dating app provider doesn’t want you to find a match because you’d stop using the app, they want endless engagent.

      Two, I hear my younger coworkers and youth say they couldn’t find a match, because none of them were good looking enough. So all the suggestions they ignored based on a picture. This really isn’t how you find a good life partner, this skips interaction and personality connections that you get in live encounters.

      • dil@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s not a dating app, its for like exposing men and talking about it, only woman can join and its id verified, but all the woman ik discuss all that amongst themselves and don’t need an app, they already have community. I guess it is for ppl who sleep with strangers using those apps? idk, will never be my problem lol.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        this skips interaction and personality connections that you get in live encounters.

        See, the problem is that those people aren’t going out enough to interact with strangers. Men are increasingly unlikely to make a move because there’s both the fear of rejection and the fear of an overreaction.

      • dil@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Commenting on tiktok has probably made me devolve tho, wouldnt be suprised if using that app makes you show signs of brain damage

      • dil@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        If my point gets across, idc, if I’m using any social media (including lemmy) I’m probably high af looking for a distraction.

  • Is there a dating app just for geeks and nerds? Easy as hell to find like-minded men; I haven’t talked to any like-minded women since high school. I don’t really like hanging out with super serious people. They never laugh at my jokes.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    The app is women-only. If you’re a man, you can’t download it, can’t search it, and can’t respond to anything on it.

    So … what’s stopping men from setting up a burner device, pretending to be a woman, and using the app?

    • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess, if you’re that into the waspish drama-queens that gossip more than breathe, sure. Got a thing for Karens, Jessicas, et al?

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        It would be really nice if this could exist without being petty. I dated a guy who lied to me about having been in jail for nearly two decades for beating his mother to death, and I would love to be able to warn others about him. I have a google alert set up for his name and got a ping a few years ago that he was arrested for violating a restraining order taken out by the woman he dated after me and felt awful that I wasn’t able to warn her.

        It’s both predictable and annoying that people are using it to be petty, but the concept is still useful, even if some use it in a way I find shallow. I don’t think it’s wild to imagine that some women would see this report and take it as a green flag. I met up with my husband for the first time after we matched on a dating app to play magic the gathering with him, so I know that some women look for nerds when dating. I previously went on a date with a different guy to play magic (I like seeing how someone plays, wins, and loses, plus it’s a low pressure first date activity that helps ease conversation), and he showed me his Khorne tattoo. He said he just really identified with the character when I asked why he had chosen Khorne, and I absolutely took that as a red flag, not because it’s nerdy, but because I don’t want to date someone who identifies with Khorne.

        I would 100% support a twin app for men about women, to be clear, and I don’t know what the solution would be for non cishetero dating, but I wouldn’t be against any of them.

        • Instigate@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’m not sure how to do it in a way that can’t be abused, sadly. My instinct is that maybe domestic violence (DV) crimes should be public knowledge - i.e. offenders, offences and sentences (but not victim information) should be on a publicly searchable database - but I’m not sure what unintended consequences there might be to this. My gut tells me that women reporting DV might experience more backlash from violent partners because reporting the DV puts the offender on a ‘list’, and that maybe it could encourage some abusers to vexatiously make false accusations to try to get someone on the list, but I don’t know how likely either of those would be. There’s not a simple solution, but we need to keep searching for the difficult solution because the status quo leads to way too many women dying at the hands of current or former partners.

          • boonhet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            In my country, an influencer set up such a website. Posts are manually reviewed and will link to the conviction decision. You can post domestic violence and sexual abuse perpetrators who have been committed. The court decisions are actually public data anyway, just a bit annoying to search.

            • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Now, to fix the court system so that certain people don’t file a DV claim to fuck with someone, knowing full well it’ll get thrown out at best, but without any blowback on the perpetrator. 🤢

              The system is not made for serving any of us —it was designed to incarcerate our population in record numbers, and with impunity.

              ACAB, the whole way up.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I can see that, and if this were the only way for people to look up a member of the public without them having created a public profile, I wouldn’t support it. It would be much easier to stalk someone through the websites where you can input a phone number and get all the associated addresses and additional contact information, though. In jurisdictions where those are allowed, I think the information shared on this type of platform is much less useful for stalking and more useful for legitimate purposes.

            Although I would be curious about how a platform like this would work legally in a jurisdiction with solid privacy laws.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Nah, sorry. The excuse women use is safety, it’s just gossip at industrial scale.

              I’m gonna build a men-only app for libeling women. We’ll call it Dox.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                From my original comment:

                I would 100% support a twin app for men about women, to be clear, and I don’t know what the solution would be for non cishetero dating, but I wouldn’t be against any of them.

                I’m not bothered if you build an app, though I don’t know why people would want to use it if it were intentionally libelous.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Chuds already did that, furious at the idea that women were talking to each other about men and even doing things they don’t approve of.

      Edit: awww the Lemmycels are mad ;)

  • misk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t know any single guys that collect Pokémon cards. I know two guys that collect Pokémon cards, are married and have children. Maybe women don’t want autistic children because likelihood of that is admittedly increased in this small sample. They’re missing out but you can’t force people to like something they don’t.

    • mystrawberrymind@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m sure if two people are dating and one says they like pokemon, it’s cool haha whatever. But if the dating profile is all the other person has to go off of, then they can make assumptions like, well he could be too childish or too nerdy, etc. lol

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure what you’re being down votes for.

      I assume people read your post as "people who collect pokemon cards are autistic " but i assumed it was the two people you know who collect cards and are married are both autistic hence mentioning your small sample size

      • misk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        My original comment was a bit more direct so I updated it to clarify a little and you probably read that version.