There was a recent wrecker post that did this a lot. It comes across as reactionary to me but sometimes I see leftists doing it too. Nerd culture being associated with being childish/nostalgic and easily exploited by sanitised consumption, etc.
As an autistic person who sometimes gets hyperfixations that could be seen as childish, it feels gross to have people paint these hobbies as some kind of uniquely hyperconsumerist thing, because 90% of the time it’s just because the hobby is seen as childish and/or neurodivergent coded.
For example: I was hyperfixated on gardening for a while. It was expensive, really hard to do ethically and the industry itself is massively corporate and responsible for some of the biggest environmental problems today. It’s a nice little escapist hobby where you can turn your mind off while you pretend you aren’t fucking up your local biome because Monsanto decided it would sell more soil wetter, plant disease cures and fertilizer ifs product kills the soils ability to self regulate. I tried to do it the organic permaculture way, ended up being too expensive and half of the products were not in fact as ethical as they pretended to be. Also I have a degree in Ecology, most gardners don’t have that luxury and are not trained how to garden ethically. Never once have I ever seen anyone call gardening a vapid corporate hobby or expressed concern that I was using my fake little biome to escape from the real world. Never once have I been lumped in with the same people who invented DDT. Because it’s a socially acceptable hobby for a well adjusted adult to have.
I can’t say the same for when I had a Pokemon hyperfixation. It was a relatively cheap hobby, I mostly just played the games and the rom hacks were fun. But I stopped because who wants to be associated with grown ass adults waiting in line for cards and playing a childrens game! They must be mentally ill in some way, right? Now adults who still like a hobby they grew up with get put into the same camp as Harry Potter fans, who we have apparently now have decided are bad because Harry Potter is childish and whimsical, not because the writer is a racist transphobe.
Just something that mulls over in my head sometimes, because social dynamics that make no sense to me are another thing I like to fixate on and dissect for fun. I tend to see how the flow of popular narratives can manipulate people into adopting reactionary talking points. All you have to do is trojan something onto a socially acceptable target without outright saying the target and you have even leftists redirected to attack a target that the right want dead. People are funny.
Thanks for reading my weird rant. I could just be coming across as insecure and making myself an easy target for wreckers to get a rant from, but eh who cares if I get a reputation as someone easily baited by this subject. Someones gotta deconstruct this kind of thing so it might as well be me.

The fuck does this have to do with this thread?
I guess you must be pretty happy that they’re entirely un-peopled and have zero capability to say “no” to anything by law, then.
If you think kids are just stupid, I guess there’s nothing for that.
What did the r-slur originally mean? Seems like this works both ways to me.
EDIT: well I guess I’d edit my comment to remove all of that garbage too.
It’s one of the methods patriarchy discredits and delegitimizes stuff women enjoy.
I have mixed feeling on this. I was young and foolish. Now I’m slightly older and foolish!
Children can be quite smart, but they also lack life experiences. Teaching them about the world is extremely valuable, but growing up supplies a sort of “learning by the ropes” experience that teaches more contextual lessons.
This is one of the many reasons shoving neurodivergent children “under the carpet” is so incredibly catastrophic and helps perpetuate their general suffering and isolation.
When I was ~8 I knew some programming but didn’t understand what capitalist IP law was and why the status quo says piracy is bad.
Kids aren’t stupid, they’re just still in the process of learning!
Many such cases
With regard to the rest of your comment I don’t disagree, I was pretty unwise in my teen years as well. It’s the idea that kids inherently can’t understand anything that bugs me, because it leads directly into parents owning their kids as property type situations as we see in the imperial core.
Oh yeah! Absolutely!
deleted by creator
I quoted you directly. Immediately jumping to insinuating that a trans person is a pedo is real smooth. Always gets the crowd going, bonus points for doing it when she’s talking ahout the rights of kids. [User said that I was being uncharitable, and in turn asked me if I don’t “believe in the age of consent law”]
You said “they don’t have the capacity to understand the world the way adults do” which sounds a lot more like “innately less intelligent” than “not educated” and lines up nicely with the dehumanisation of kids.
Your take got construed extremely uncharitably because it is bad, sorry:
Fwiw, I do think I have a problem with misapplication of “force” in conversational terms. I went all soft trying to educate a wrecker that got banned, many such cases. I do stand behind what I said though.
Huh, I missed their original post, but it looks like they were implying I was exalting children? Which is odd because I was strictly speaking about adults and how people missunderstand what maturity and acting like an adult really is.
It’s funny to see a couple of people (not you, you’re cool) completely miss the mark on what I mean while perfectly demonstrating what I’m complaining about. That people missunderstand what being a mature adult is and boil it down to harmful stereotypes that promote misery and repressing joy, empathy, humor, creativity and whimsy by demonising positive emotions as nostalgic, sanitised and only for children.
Removed by mod