• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hmm let’s have a think about how much each system costs, what the consequences could be if implemented poorly, and how much they involving depriving people of what they currently have?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean Flock cameras, if implemented poorly (or successfully) involve depriving people of their privacy and their consequences include aiding aspiring tyrants in violating people’s rights.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Oh yes, that aspect is a deliberate part of the comparison. I don’t know about you though, but I’d rather have a flock camera outside my house streaming my every move directly into the secret service’s masturbatorium than have no house at all, or to have a high speed railway 100m away from my house, depriving me of the peace and quiet I used to enjoy.

        (So, in my country the government has to pay me the fair market value of my house, plus an additional percentage, to compel me to sell them my house when I don’t want to, so the former scenario may not work out as a “deprivation” but instead come under the “cost” category - but it’s a cost because the alternative is seriously depriving people of much more than their privacy)