• Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 分钟前

    Classic Graphene users, making this all about themselves. This hurts Aurora users, period.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 分钟前

      Classic Graphene users, making this all about themselves. This hurts Aurora users, period.

      Edit: I ran into the same issue. For now, refreshing the anonymous Aurora account solved it.

  • bruh@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 小时前

    I was wondering cant we just scrape Play Store and distribute the apks on a different website? most apks has checksums so we will know nobody has changes the apk

    • vas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 小时前

      and distribute the apks on a different website

      Or with distributed technologoes such as torrents. Then it’s cheaper to operate any required servers.

  • plsnerf7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 小时前

    Yup can confirm. Some apps return this error (example tutamail and windscribe vpn). Fix it by downloading the apk in fdroid or github/ gitlab directly.

  • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 小时前

    Seems like clickbait but the graphene devs recommend against aurora store in favor of using a second profile with the sandboxed play store

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 小时前

      The Play Store requires a Google account. Using a second profile is extremely inconvenient.

      • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 小时前

        Graphene recommending this at all is extremely sus. My objective of using your operating system is to avoid giving Google any information I possibly can. Don’t know why they always recommend using Google shit in a sandbox like those packets aren’t still coming from my IP.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 小时前

          Its not sus. They’re just hyper-aware of security. And Aurora is just not terribly secure. Its just that you’re now choosing between privacy and maximum security. And I prioritize privacy, personally.

          They pretty much only recommend Accrescent.

          • vas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 小时前

            I agree. Specifically, it’s privacy AND freedom (free software development model).

            If these two are against maximum security, GrapheneOS consistently chooses security. Which is unfortunate for me, because I would consistently choose freedom. (Especially due to long-term considerations.)

            • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              52 分钟前

              You can disregard their recommendation if you wish, I do sometimes. If they were here, I imagine they’d say they don’t see privacy and security as contradicting each other, just that there are different threat models. I think they subscribe to the idea that not everyone is going to be sufficiently informed in order to make a rational judgement, so instead they default to lowering potential risk. They do value accessibility for the tech illiterate as well.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 分钟前

      I used APKPure for a good two years without much issue. Just felt very scammy with all the ads and it felt complicated because I was never sure which version to pick. Switched to Aurora (recommended officially by Huawei) and haven’t had a single issue ever since. Can even download beta versions now.

      I’m not having any issues today either, kinda wondering what’s going on to be honest.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 分钟前

      What alternative are you going to make? My bank only publishes their app on Play Store. I can either use Play Store app or Aurora to install it. You think that if you build alternative, open source store my bank will publish their app there? You think any bank will? F-Droid already exists, do you see any banks publishing their apps there? Do you see any of them dong Linux version of their apps?

      The alternative here would be some other corporation building independent app store and getting everyone to publish their apps there. Amazon tried that many years ago. Maybe Samsung could do it now. It’s definitely not something we can make.

  • PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    8 小时前

    It appears Google tries to degrade alternative application stores to just another app offered through the Play Store, and therefore subject to Google’s policies (including an annual $5,000 fee for policy and security reviews). So I wouldn’t be surprised this is very much intentional: as to force application stores through a channel controlled by Google, to technically allow competition (at Google’s discretion) while ultimately killing “side-loading” through other sources.

    • capital5@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 小时前

      Remember when Microsoft was forced to give a “select your web browser” prompt when setting up a Windows computer?

      Quaint times, those were…

  • UncleObli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 小时前

    Misleading title. After reading the linked Gitlab discussion it’s more likely a backend change from Google side. Aurora does use burner account but early reports seem to suggest they are not flagged or rate limited.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 小时前

        Google actively blocking Aurora Store would be much worse than them simply changing their backend. The latter can likely be quickly resolved while the former might lead to a cat and mouse game, where it gets increasingly difficult for Aurora Store to continue to work.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 小时前

              LOL yes, anyone asking you questions you can’t answer about the shit you’re saying is “sealioning”.

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 小时前

                The thing is, it’s already been answered. The conclusion was made based on reading the gitlab discussion. 🤷‍♂️ I didn’t read that myself but maybe try doing that if you’re curious. 😉🫶

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 小时前

                  The thing is, the conclusion is not going to be in any discussion outside of a Google internal chat or meeting. We know what happened, we don’t know why it happened, or what it means.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 小时前

      all updates were failing to download here.

      rebooted the device, and i just tested one update right from the app’s details page and that went on ok. will try the others from the update ui later, after the battery gets charged up.