War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Privacy is surveillance

  • joranm1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They’ve been actually listening to conversations for years, what is new is that an LLM is going to report about it to the user… which is quite ironic if you ask me.

    Imagine breaking up with the one you love only to have your watch remind you about it later… pathetic

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Assumably it’s a “passive” feature that you have to explicitly tell “hey keep record of that” within 15 seconds of the interaction.

      So a little less doom and gloom than the headline suggests.

      Edit: It seems I mixed up features. This still doesnt sound terrible. You as a user turn it on, the device emits a tone and visual cue. You can do the same thing with any number of sound recording devices out there, and they give literally zero warning they are recording.

  • LeftReddit2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You know gamers, I really love how this era of capitalism we’re living in is just companies trying to spy on us as hard as possible to know what exactly to advertise to us and if you show any form of rejection to it, then you get called a schizo by your friends.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    George Orwell only made two mistakes:

    • He was off by 42 years
    • The surveillance is conducted by the private sector in cahoots with the fascist state for profit rather than directly by the state.
    • GMac@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Third mistake. He forgot to tell us that his 1984 was the sequel to Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World… we could have avoided this if we didnt become mindless consumers.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Currently we live in a world where neither book became completely true. However, bits and pieces from both did. Nowadays there’s all sorts of enjoyment and distraction easily available, and it seems to partially take the role soma has in BNW.

        • GMac@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Not just soma, the censorship of the different, the unavailability of inconvenient history or information is a direct parallel to the echo chamber bubbles of social media, then constant advertising, that anything new must be more expansive, complex, and require more equipment that the pre-existing alternative.

          I think we worried too much about one book and not enough about the other. 1984 seems to be coming now that the BNW prepared the population into distracted acquiesence but where does that then lead? Do we become the eloi after that?

          I find the psychosocial parallels fascinating. Sorry if it seems a bit tinfoil…

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            There are indeed many eerie similarities. Both books got many themes correct, even though the exact details were wrong. BNW isn’t as popular and well known as 1984, and that’s why the latter still gets all the attention. If people knew BNW, they would be referencing it all the time, since modern life is pretty messed up even by BNW standards.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      The surveillance is conducted by the private sector in cahoots with the fascist state for profit rather than directly by the state.

      it had always been this way and orwell would have known that if he didn’t buy into the propaganda.

      i’ll be forever funny that COINTELPRO was active during orwell’s time so there’s a strong possibility that it elevated his work because of its pro-propaganda messaging.

  • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah but its OK when its Apple and not Zuckerberg who are doing it. I have no idea why Apple keeps getting away with everything they do. They could release Metas creepy smartglasses tomorrow in an aluminium finish and people would love them and excuse any privacy concerns.

    • ExtremeDullard@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not quite:

      The Facebook pervert glasses are purchased by perverts to shoot videos of their victims, and Facebook rides along to perform their privacy invasion.

      Apple’s watch performs the same insane level of privacy invasion but all you get in return is a lousy text summary of what was said. Nothing to jack off on or blackmail someone with like with the Facebook spectacles.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Nothing to jack off on

        Oh you sweet summer child 😂

        I was thinking things like skimming credit card numbers or some creep hearing you give you phone number to the clerk and stalking you.

        Video is different, but the ability to record 24/7 has all kinds of criminal possibilities.

      • degen@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Getting the last 15 seconds summarized honestly sounds almost useless and kind of a cringe feature to showcase in the first place

  • The wearer’s Watch emits an audible tone, even in silent mode, to alert those in the vicinity and provides a visual cue for those able to see the face of the device.

    Nonetheless, bystanders alerted to the recording – to the extent they recognize the meaning of the tone – have not consented to being recorded, which is a legal requirement in 11 US states that have all-party consent laws.

    Ok, so it actively alerts about the recording, unlike “Voice Memos” or any other audio recorder app. And so its on the onus of the user to ensure those in the conversation consent, which is and has always been the case for any sort of recording device. Apple bad, updoots to the right pls

  • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Great, first we had to be on the lookout for assholes wearing Rayban glasses, now we have to be wary of anyone wearing an Apple Watch…

    • DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I have an old Apple Watch and this made me wanna get rid of it.

      I’ve bought into their ecosystem (mainly just because I hate every other tech giant slightly more) but they’ve really done little to impress me these past few years…