No evidence that UFOs are aliens — NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific::NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific.

  • GONADS125@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What would be better phrasing? Acknowledged? It was previously classified and denied, and they have now admitted to the existence of the programs and phenomenon.

    The information is valid regardless if people want to believe it. My post is thoroughly cited.

    • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s cool man if you want to keep sounding like a dime store Don Quixote. The adversarial subtext of your phrasing will make the majority of people ignore you and will taint the perception of whatever you cite.

      • GONADS125@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I don’t have a problem with my wording. You’re just jumping to all sorts of conclusions. I’m not responsible for other people’s ignorance and unwillingness to challenge their beliefs.

        My argument is logically sound and I don’t feel it comes off like the mad scrolls of some Q-anon nut job whatsoever. I think your hang-up and useless criticism here is just a reflection of your emotional maturity level and propensity for emotional reasoning. I presented factual information with logical reasoning. You’re emotionally reasoning here.

        If someone is unwilling to even open a lemmy post link and instead writes it off without any consideration, that’s just a reflection of their own ignorance and unwillingness to challenge their beliefs.

        I don’t feel the need to tiptoe around the facts, and there’s always going to be people unwilling to consider the information. I’ve already done a hell of a lot, compiling all of that information and that write-up. But I’ll be sure to remember that you don’t like the way the information makes you feel next time.

        • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah I was trying to help ya but it sounds like you might be closer to the mind set that I was trying to help you not sound like.

          • GONADS125@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, what help you were by repeatedly condensing me and calling me a q-anon crazy! You should become a motivational speaker!

            • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t call you that but your responses do lend some credibility to the notion. If you don’t want to be taken seriously fine, I don’t really care