I’ve spent the last few years devouring Soviet history. Books, papers, blog posts, podcasts, all of it. I can’t get enough. Not to brag, but I do feel as though I’ve achieved a certain level of understanding about the USSR, its history, and eventual collapse. But I’ve also put the work in.

And yet, whenever I engage people I know IRL or online, I’m amazed by how doggedly people will defend what they just inherently “know”: that the Soviet Union was an evil totalitarian authority dictatorship that killed 100 million of its own people and eventually collapsed because communism never works. None of these people (at least the people I know IRL) have learned anything about Soviet history beyond maybe a couple days of lectures and a textbook chapter in high school history classes. Like, I get that this is the narrative that nearly every American holds in their heads. The fact that people believe this isn’t surprising. But what is a little surprising to me is that, when confronted with a challenge to that narrative from someone they know has always loved history and has bothered to learn more, they dig their heels in and insist they are right and I am wrong.

This isn’t about me, I’m just sharing my experience with this. I’m just amazed at how Americans will be completely ignorant about a topic (not just the USSR) but will be utterly convinced their views on that topic are correct, despite their own lack of investigation into that topic. This is the same country where tens of millions of people think dinosaurs and humans walked around together and will not listen to what any “scientist” has to say about it, after all.

  • SunriseParabellum [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is a painful irony, Libs just repeat things they half remember form High School history or like a History Channel show and just take it as “common knowledge” and think they can just state it the same way you state the word is round. Then when you ask them for sources they just scoff at the idea they need to back up their ideas, clearly it’s just common knowledge.

    Then we show up, and argue they’re wrong, and suddenly they demand a doctoral thesis with MLA citations. And half the time we do provide good citations, which they will scrutinize to death, a standard they aren’t expected to meet for their beliefs.

    • JeffBozo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      And half the time we do provide good citations, which they will scrutinize to death

      Wrong. They will say “I ain’t reading all that” and ignore it.

      • SunriseParabellum [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nah that’s more CHUDs, Libs will pretend to read it but then question the validity of the source, even if the source is the fucking NY Times or the WHO.

        Libs are so propagandized the don’t even believe their own propaganda when it doesn’t tow the narrative.

        • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Evidence for your claims, but it comes from a sketchy source?

          “Umm sweaty you are a genocide putler apologist how dare you question my infallible sources”

          Evidence against your claims, and it comes from God himself?

          “Clearly, the good lord above has been brainwashed by the CCP”

    • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What libs are you running into that scrutinize sources?

      “Umm sweaty the author is Chinese and therefore wrong and brainwashed. No I am not racist.”