• McBinary@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think I would be okay with 8-10 year iterations. 3-4 years is a ridiculous money grab. I haven’t owned an XBOX since the 360 though, so…

    • Jordan Lund
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Historic generations were about 5 years…

      The big problem with the Xbox One was that it was underpowered because of the Kinect requirement, so they ditched Kinect then rebranded as the Xbox One S, throwing in a 4K Blu Ray player.

      Still wasn’t enough, so the One X had full 4K capabilities.

      If they had launched with the One X things would have looked a lot different.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Sony does what they did with the PS4, they’ll release a PS5 Pro next year and a PS6 in 2028. Pretty easy to follow at least.

    • fugacity@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if I would see it as a pure money grab. Pretty sure game consoles, just like inkjet printers and the like are sold with zero or near zero profit (or even at a loss). The benefit the console manufacturer gains from the platform lock-in far outweighs whatever greed they might have trying to reap gains from the hardware. 10 year old hardware is roughly 30x slower in FLOPs, so we might be looking at a desire for better games or easier software development - I for sure would not envy the developer needing to target 10 year old hardware, though it’s not exactly unheard of.