• Corroded@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like the lines at that point get way too blurred. It would be like having a “porn” and “full blown porn” tag or hardcore versus softcore.

    I will admit a distinct NSFW tag could be good for somewhat taboo stuff like mildly offensive jokes for example.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be kind of hilarious. You can have one normal tag like “serious” is for ask lemmy, then a million tags like soft core, forced, NSFL, etc…

      Like the fediverse would be catering to SO MUCH PORN at that point

      • Corroded@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it would mean much with each instance having their own rules.

        I can only imagine instances arguing and defederating from each other because they have different rules regarding tagging.

    • tehmics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if we just had specific tags that we could filter for. everything gets the nsfw tag but we have specific tags for nudity, violence, etc.

      • Corroded@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure my concern would still be blurred lines and people either forgetting to use tags or not realizing how or when to use them. For example a news article about police violence getting tagged with the violence tag on some instances but not others.

        I’m also opposed to auto or over moderation and I feel like it’s one of those things that could potentially push Lemmy in that direction eventually.