• totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This week, TON Foundation announced that it’s forged a partnership with Tencent Cloud, which has “already successfully supported TON validators and plans to expand its services further to help meet TON’s high compute intensity and network bandwidth needs.” Validators, in web3 lingo, are participants that help authenticate transactions in a blockchain network.

      It looks like the partnership with Tencent only extends to their Web3 blockchain thing, and there doesn’t seem to be any partnership in the main app so it’s not the end of the world - at least, for now.

      Also, what even is this TON blockchain? I never knew Telegram had anything to do with crypto :/

      • fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, nah. Anything the CCP can slip it’s slimy festering little dick into, it will.

        There’s no way in hell that Telegram is secure.

        • totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess, but I don’t see how much they can really influence Telegram without any stake in the app itself. They only seem to have a deal for cloud-hosting with the TON Foundation, a non-critical part of the app, and even that appears to be non-exclusive. So if Tencent tries to force a bad decision onto Telegram, what’s stopping them from severing ties and moving everything over to another provider?

          Of course, we don’t know what the situation will be like in the future, but at this present moment, I don’t think Telegram’s security has been breached by this. (Also I think you triple-posted this comment)

      • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Am also gonna stick with signal, eyeing up matrix. But what issues? The only reason i haven’t tested it out yet is none of my friends seem too keen on trying it.

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For a lack of a better term: jank. Too much jank. For one instance, I have never seen in Whatsapp or Signal the phrase “unable to decrypt message”. I can deal with that personally, but >90% of the people I need to communicate to with messengers will drop a service and never look back if they see that.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We have chat standard called XMPP created by literially the same org that makes standards for Internet and Email.

        And there are other public protocols to choose from.

        • TheEntity@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately XMPP died roughly when the mobile devices became a mainstay. The way Google de facto took over the protocol didn’t help either, but even without it XMPP isn’t fit for the mobile-first world. The client needs to maintain an active connection at all times and there is nothing akin to push messaging, causing quite a significant battery drain. I might be unaware of some progress in this regard but this is how I remember it.

  • figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Everyone complaining about both telegram and signal here should, idk, just start dead dropping handwritten notes to people inside of dead rats, like the true privacy experts.

    Privacy is important, yes. But if all of my friends use telegram, I’m going to use it too. Not only that, I’m going to be happy about it, because the telegram app is 1000x better than pretty much any other messaging app.

    braces for angry downvotes

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Telegram has open source their client code. Not their server code. It’s even on f Droid.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But it’s starting to get worse. Now they won’t send you an SMS code for registration unless you are using official build of the app. Even chat app under libre licence must connect with something…

      • Clot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it costs them too much to send code as sms, also some client abuse that in some way, it also may help them to increase the download count of their official app which is not bad imo.

  • No_@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uninstalled and moved to signal. But no one I know is on signal 🤡

  • whitecapstromgard@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Telegram is a suprisingly good app.

    • Open source clients
    • Decent Linux client on the laptop (whatsapp desktop is just terrible)
    • It can be downloaded without Google’s appstore.

    I wish other apps were half as good as Telegram.

    • Clot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah it is too good for just to be called a messaging app, hope it will be more privacy focused

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telegram has the best clients ever. But those clients need to connect to something and this is where we encounter a big problem.

      • Virkkunen@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But isn’t that the whole point of a messaging service? Connect to something else that’s not local and have your messages exchanged?

        • Muehe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think smileyhead is alluding to the fact that Telegram servers are not open source, just the clients are.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It bothers me that the major complaint is not the privacy issues or the people who own it behind the scenes…

        but the technology used to build the desktop application. Electron is just a tool.

      • totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hasn’t the founder been a vocal critic of Russia for years, including the Ukraine war? I don’t really see why that would be a concern, especially since Telegram is supposedly owned by a US LLC

        • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Russia has an army of “vocal critics” who play an important role in the pantomime, you see them on RT regularly. It doesn’t prove anything.

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The shitty forced “stories” did me question seriously this once wonderful app. If I’d want to look at crappy TikTok-like shorts from other people, I’d be on TikTok.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was under impression that Google Play and Apple App Store don’t allow apps that can do practically everything (super apps). Is it really allowed? If a completely new company submit a chat app that somehow includes taxy hailing, food delivery, nfc/qr wallet and micro-loan features all at once instead of adding those features gradually in future updates, would Apple and Google accept the app?

    • friendlyhobo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      WeChat and other composite apps are already on the stores, so I don’t see why others also wouldn’t be allowed.