Linuxmemed@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 year agodeez nutslemmy.worldimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1189
arrow-up1189imagedeez nutslemmy.worldLinuxmemed@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squarereedts@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-21 year agoIf it was only an init system I’d be ok with it. But it isn’t…
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYou need to use its init system (systemd), its logging system (systemd-journald, and can be forwarded to old school syslog), and some dbus implementation. If that’s an unreasonable requirement for your usecase, check out OpenRC
minus-squareSuperIce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoIt’s a system daemon that manages way more than an init system, hence the name “systemd”.
minus-squarereedts@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHard question I guess. Middleware maybe?
If it was only an init system I’d be ok with it. But it isn’t…
You need to use its init system (systemd), its logging system (systemd-journald, and can be forwarded to old school syslog), and some dbus implementation.
If that’s an unreasonable requirement for your usecase, check out OpenRC
then what would you define it as?
It’s a system daemon that manages way more than an init system, hence the name “systemd”.
Everything
Hard question I guess. Middleware maybe?