[A]n INI configuration file in the Windows Canary channel, discovered by German website Deskmodder, includes references to a “Subscription Edition,” “Subscription Type,” and a “subscription status.”

    • agent_flounder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      1 year ago

      In effect, it will be for some people fed up with all this bullshit.

      • Lord Goose@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone who switched to Linux primarily because of Windows 11’s never ending BS (bugs, resource mismanagement, etc) and the inevitably end of Windows 10, I can confirm that Windows 10 will be my last.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d say the most extreme bullshit began with Windows 10. At least the threat of “upgrading” to it was the final push to Linux for me.

    • idontknowman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      tbf, it was Jerry Nixon who said that, a developer evangelist for microsoft, not the company itself. the media just ran with it.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s crazy how often it gets quoted as fact. I mean, just think about it from a logical standpoint, why would a profit-driven software development company just stop making new versions of one of their main money makers?

        • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much nobody purchases Windows. Microsoft peobably makes all the money from OEM licenses sold to manufacturers and I don’t really think there’s that much of an increase in sales once they release a new OS.

        • elfin8er@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I figured they’d just start calling it “Windows” and continue naming future updates with the date like they do now (ie 22H1, 22H2, 23H1, etc).

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But then they wouldn’t be able to sell new enterprise licenses with that model (to OEMs/businesses).

        • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It wasn’t killing new versions of Windows, it was the decision to move to more of a rolling release model over the historical point releases which we saw as 10’s lifespan went on and still see in 11 with their “moments”. Specific Windows version was going to become less emphasized in favor of having a larger install base for the Store and whatever MS wants to do to that install base. And the big buyers of Windows were always volume sales too.

          And then something changed, whether OEM’s complained, someone decided a change was necessary, etc. and boom, 11.