• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    First of all, cars have a much greater grip on the road in icy conditions. So they can handle things like black ice when riding a bicycle on it would be extremely dangerous.

    But sure, every small city and town with harsh winters are beyond relevance.

    • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Small city and towns don’t have cars now?

      Guy who said “don’t put words in my mouth” literally 10 minutes ago

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Small cities and towns have a big problem solving things like black ice for cars. Hence the many accidents on days like that when people drive in those conditions. I know because I used to work for the local news station.

        But hey, we’re beyond relevance.

        • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Beyond relevance period?

          I thought I meant beyond relevance for urbanism, and by the way I mostly meant for this discussion about snow on bike lanes.

          Guy who said “don’t put words in my mouth” literally 10 minutes ago

          Small towns going bankrupt is a result of newer means of transportation concentrating centers of activity within a region.

          If you can’t clean the ice for cars, cleaning it for bikes is cheaper. If you can’t do any, then don’t do any - you’ve got worse problems. Thus, irrelevant for this discussion.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I thought I meant beyond relevance for urbanism

            I can’t go by what you thought you meant. I went by what you said.

            • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I went by what you said.

              You literally didn’t. You cut it off mid sentence.

              It’s insane how you’ve moved the goalpost from “It’s impossible to clean snow off bike lanes” to “it’s impossible to clean snow off some bike lanes when the conditions of the bike lanes are very specific” to “it’s impossible to clean off bikelanes when the city is tiny and too broke to clean it off roads in the first place”

              Guess what? Then don’t clean them. Discussion has been moved to a segment of the problem that is so small and uninteresting that and if you had been clear about your message in the first place, nobody would’ve needed to answer you

              Bye

              I went by what you said.