I care about my privacy, though I like it’s UI. Is it really as bad as some say?

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yea I don’t think it’s bad for privacy, just there are better options out there which get you the same privacy while also addressing other issues? Issues like Chromium, history of controversies and shady behaviour (crypto, replacing ads with their own), the business model, and issues with the CEO.

      Instead, why not just use standard Firefox? The only downside I’ve heard is that the default settings don’t do what Brave does when you first install each browser, but that’s a weak argument considering we all modify the settings anyway. Someone should just outline which Firefox settings should be flipped to match default Brave, and we can be done with the weekly ‘Why not Brave’ discussions

      I use Firefox as my daily browser, and run Mullvad browser when I need to be cautious with a task.

    • @AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Any suggestions for someone who has multiple clients who solely support Chrome-only for their products so I have to do all my testing in Chrome (or Brave, Vivaldi, etc.)?

      In some cases their apps straight up don’t function in Firefox or look substantially different and I’m not really allowed to bill for the time to address that.

      • @chayleaf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just use something vanilla like Ungoogled Chromium. Don’t use it for everything, only for working on projects that require it.

      • @jjdelc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        And it is because of these lousy developers that live inside a Google world that people don’t want to use Firefox.

        • @Liforra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Well stuff like chromegle, there isn’t anything similar on Firefox, and there are just less extensions in general. Probably the dumbest reason but doesn’t change the fact that i need them

  • @headset@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1151 year ago

    Be careful, Brave marketing team is well known for disguising themselves as users and promote their bloated crapware via comments.

    They overdid it in 4chan and ended up alienating the entire community.

    Then they moved to Reddit but people already started seeing Brave for what they really are, a scummy company that has been caught redhanded way to many times to be trusted.

    Now they are here on Lemmy, desperately trying to get more chumps under their ad machine before BAT hits 0 and their advertising partners lose all interest.

    Just say no to Brave, there are way better browsers out there, with real privacy, that won’t make you look like a hateful brainwashed-by-politics piece of shit.

  • Melody Fwygon
    link
    English
    601 year ago

    YES, IT IS!

    You should NOT trust Brave to not play fast and loose with your privacy. They already operate an advertising network (it operates on those stupid little BAT tokens) and they DO inject ads and affiliate links.

    I strongly recommend Firefox1 or Librewolf.

    1 - You must install plugins and apply user.js fixes yourself to properly harden Firefox completely against tracking; but this is doable.

    • @Valkeerie@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Hey, I use Firefox but I’ve never heard of making edits to the user.js config. Could you point me in the direction of some information about this?

    • @gothicdecadence@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Someone on the last Brave thread suggested using Floorp and honestly I’ve been loving it. It comes with Tree Style Tabs support but I much I prefer Sidebery so I use Floorp’s built in sidebar with Sidebery instead. It works fantastic, and using Firefox color theming to tweak everything also works well.

  • Orbituary
    link
    fedilink
    601 year ago

    Why does this topic keep coming up?

    Anything. 👏 Chromium. 👏 Based. 👏 Is. 👏 Bad.

    If you give a shit, you’ll suck it up and change to Firefox or Mull. If your excuse for not doing so is UI based, your convenience is more important than your privacy.

    • @Kiosfriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      bros using ff🤡. if you’re not literally using a terminal based text only browser on linux from scratch on a vm whose bare metal is disconnected from the internet and in a faraday cage in an underground bunker, your convenience is more important than your privacy.

      Anything. 👏 Internet. 👏 Based. 👏 Is. 👏 Bad.

    • Baketime
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Is there a better alternative on Android? I’ve tried switching to Firefox a few times but it feels way too slow. Scrolling and zooming (I do a lot of zooming on mobile) feels unusably choppy.

      • Eager Eagle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Looks smooth to me. In fact, as the only Android browser afaik that has support for ublock origin, Firefox is the only usable mobile option IMO.

        • Orbituary
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Seconded.

          Mull is a Firefox fork that’s even more privacy oriented and still can sync with your FF settings.

      • @0x2d@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        yeah I have 2 apps on my computer that use electron

        discord and balena etcher

  • Dudewitbow
    link
    fedilink
    361 year ago

    It has an opt in option to sell ad space for some of its crypto. Some people just are offended that the option is even there.

    • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      because that effectively make them an advertising company.

      Advertising online is incompatible with privacy, there’s no reconciliation between the two. And whoever tells you otherwise, is an advertiser.

      • Dudewitbow
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Some people dont see it as a black and white issue.

        Does firefox lose its privacy status if it takes google money and makes the default search engine google search?

        • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Definitely yes. Firefox is not private as provided by Mozilla. You have to use a custom user.js to disable all the tracking, or install a Firefox based browser like Librewolf or Mullvad Browser.

          • Dudewitbow
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Hence not everyone sees it as a black and white thing, because there will be a lot of people who would disagree with your statement to some extent.

      • @virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Unfortunately there’s ads in Firefox too, and they’re opt out instead of opt in. I’m certainly not a fan of it, but outside of LibreWolf until servo becomes a thing I think should be right but we’re stuck choosing lesser of multiple evils.

        • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          there’s a huge difference: Firefox does not inject ads on the pages you visit.

          Anyway, I recommend to use Librewolf or Mullvad Browser instead of Firefox.

    • @Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      It’s always been weird to me how people use Brave. Like there’s a big class of Brave users who seem like people who would just be better off on Firefox? I guess it’s some of the best evidence I have seen that marketing works.

      • Jose
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The problem is, that Firefox Android can’t group tabs. That’s VERY important for me, and is the only reason I don’t use Firefox (it’s messy using different browsers in PC/Phone).

    • @Tibert@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I like Firefox mostly because it’s cool to have engine competition. I mostly use the default dark theme. It looks good enough for me. I don’t look much at the top when browsing.

      On android it’s still lagging behind the chromium competition. And having mismatched browsers isn’t great for syncing. So I just use Firefox on android too, good enough.

      Tho, if miss matching wasn’t an issue, personally I think I would use Kiwi browser. It’s an open source chromium browser which supports chrome extensions.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      It’s less about whether any individual thing they’ve done has been bad, more that they keep doing things and keep doing thm in sneaky ways. Every time something happened the CEO went on a marketing campaign and drummed up a bunch of new users to drown out the news story. They come across as shady, which gives the impression that it would take a relatively small sack of money for them to sell their users up the river.

      Brave is better than some out of the box, but far from the best. I’d say Mull is better for mobile, which is a Firefox fork. It has a companion Android System Webview called Mulch.

  • @clearleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    It’s literally just a coat of paint on google chrome. You might as well install internet explorer toolbars until an unknown browser appears on your desktop and use that.

    • @Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Chromite, this is sounder Fork and a new generation of bromite (like the most secure and private browser on android(excluding tor maybe))

    • Teon
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      F-Droid has a few choices in it’s repos. Privacy Browser, Mull, just to name a few.

    • @canyouck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      This may not be helpful, but if you’re willing to flash GrapheneOS on a pixel, Vanadium is wonderful.

      • @Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Vanadium has not that many features, no dark mode, no Adblocking

        They used to recommend bromite, but since it’s not developed anymore they don’t

        But there’s a promising fork of bromite called chromite, I tried it recently and it rocks

          • @Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            It doesn’t have the dark mode, the one that makes white pages black

            The DNS Adblocking fix is not really viable if you live nowhere near that server, otherwise it will make your experience miserable

    • dalë
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Vivaldi if you want a chromium privacy experience. Not fully open source but works well, has desktop sync and a good tablet UI which is my biggest reason for not using FF.

      I only have a tablet and a phone and until FF creates a viable tablet UI I’m staying away.

      • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Vivaldi is not a “privacy” experience. It sure has some comfy features, but Vivaldi is not private. Use it if you like it’s UI features, just know that it isn’t private.

  • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Not at all.

    The brave criticisms you see are mostly hot takes about crypto(icrypto jokes are super coool as of '20) but brave(foss) is as good or better than Firefox, IE or safari in terms of privacy.

    Firefox can nearly match that privacy with their options, but if you like brave, easier to stick with that.

    • BananaTrifleViolin
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      Part of it comes down to trust. I just don’t trust Brave Inc long term - it may well be a private browser now but I don’t trust that in to the future. I don’t trust a company that Peter Thiel invests in. I don’t trust a company that has already been shady and caught redirecting traffic secretly for referrer codes. But I also don’t trust Google or Microsoft either.

      I trust Firefox and Mozilla. I don’t like that they are dependent on Google revenue but I trust that they’re open and transparent about what they do, and not motivated or compromised by a desire to maximise profits for their venture capitalist investors.

      • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Ah, thank you, distrusting Peter thiel is at least tangentially relevant and certainly understandable(thiel-creepy brave-trustworthy?)

        I would choose Firefox before ie or safari, but Firefox also sells personalized ads and tracks your keystrokes.

        I like foss, and I like smaller companies. When another privacy-based browser comes along after brave sells its soul or gets too popular, I’ll support them too.

        Until then, brave is doing pretty good privacy-wise, especially compared to the mainstream alts.

        • @agent_flounder
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          Firefox also sells personalized ads

          Is this in reference to sponsored content on the new tab page?

          and tracks your keystrokes.

          Telemetry? Or something else?

        • @0x2d@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          brave has already sold its soul to crypto companies

          and it does nothing that firefox with extensions can’t do

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Brave is an alternative. There are better alternatives but its better than chrome or edge

    • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      the page and the tests are run by a brave employee. That’s what I have to say.

      Not saying the tests are false. The code is available. I’m just saying that the factors that the tests evaluates and the page layout, is heavily biased towards Brave. Is that a coincidence with the author being employed by Brave? I don’t know.