• Urist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn, this is genious. My future kids are going to learn so much cool stuff branded as “loopholes”.

    • balthazarsnakewizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. My friend is a high school teacher, and he did the same thing to his class - told them not to use Wikipedia, but that Wikipedia sources were fine, and the kids did actual research.

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is a nice one! Brb, going to internalize it for my own sake the theoretical children.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Schools aren’t with it. I was told in the 90s that cursive was the future. We had already progressed beyond word processors and they are having us learn fucking loopy letters.

      Uni wasn’t much better. Found myself over thirty years behind industry when I got out.

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it might depend on the field of study and location, but schools are often a little on the conservative side. Even so “loopholes” as best practices is arguably even better.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s basic research and writing. You should absolutely teach your kids common sense practices.

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        My SO is a little scared I will push too much information on them (I have a degree in geek), so I thought more of the pedagogic value of calling something a loophole/hack/cheat etc…