• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Almost 20 years ago, when the majority of Palestinians alive today were either too young to vote or hadn’t even been born. How long after an election do you assume elected leaders have any real mandate?

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My point was that regardless of their ability to do it, they were at one time the elected officials of the geographic location known as Gaza. They’re obviously not a real government in policy and action, but they’re the only thing that exists to even bear the term or concept of governance in the area.

        There is no other group to be considered as the government, no matter how awful Hamas is at being a government of any variety.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          At one time, yes, but I don’t think we should be holding the Palestinians today to that. That would be like the Dubya era. If he had kept office until now, he would certainly not represent the opinion of Americans.

          Hamas is embedded like a parasite, but there’s better ways to point this out.

    • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like over a decade ago but they havent held elections since. I’ve seen countering articles saying Hamas has overwhelming support by the people, vs actually Hamas murders anyone who goes against them. So who knows. Fog of war and all that.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        actually Hamas murders anyone who goes against them

        Well that would result in them having overwhelming support, among the survivors that is.