8GB RAM on M3 MacBook Pro ‘Analogous to 16GB’ on PCs, Claims Apple::Following the unveiling of new MacBook Pro models last week, Apple surprised some with the introduction of a base 14-inch MacBook Pro with M3 chip,…

    • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since 1990.

      I remember their CPU cycles were “worth more”.

      They also always cheapens out on stuff, even when they used “PC” hardware, CPU from 4 years ago etc and RAM & HDD/SSD were so small you basicallyhad to buy a “next tier” machine (much more expensive).

      • superschurke@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember their CPU cycles were “worth more”.

        But this exists… There’s still differences amongst PC CPUs in per-cycle performance…

        • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but their claim was just bullshit back then.

          They did optimise Photoshop wildly for Mac to try to show they were right IIRC.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is not theirs, it is IBM’s. Or rather Freescale’s, now bought out by NXP. Was true at the time.