First planned small nuclear reactor plant in the US has been canceled::NuScale and its primary partner give up on its first installation.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does solar power use some rare earth minerals and stuff like that? They own those, but you probably need them for nuclear and others

          • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, a teenage boy scout once built something like an amateur reactor in a shed in his parents backyard shed, so I see nothing wrong with a tractor on the roof or in a basement.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Currently, no. With enough investments in nuclear and less fear mongering, it’s possible that’s be an option. Small scale nuclear reactors can exist and can be safe, and the amount of nuclear material they’d need is fairly small.

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s not necessarily a need for batteries. I’m generating energy and use it up directly, and inject the overage back into the grid against a compensation, and then at night or during times of heavy cloud coverage, I draw power from the grid pretty much on par with the money I received. So far it’s a zero sum game or slightly profitable.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah go ahead and make a solar system with the dirt you have on your land. All you are doing is supporting one group of corporations over another. Worst argument I have ever seen for solar is what you have presented today.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey everyone, this comment doesn’t say that solar is bad. It says this isn’t the argument for solar the OP thinks it is. Solar requires a whole lot of mining and refining. Nuclear actually requires less. Using the same argument, nuclear is the better option. It’s just a stupid argument.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Solar power was actually pushed by big oil in the 70s, 80s and 90s because they were afraid of nuclear.

      Solar was not viewed as a viable energy system by big oil back then.