Bill Gates says a 3-day work week where ‘machines can make all the food and stuff’ isn’t a bad idea::“A society where you only have to work three days a week, that’s probably OK,” Bill Gates said.

        • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unions are tragically toothless when the federal government can just decide a planned strike is illegal.

          • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            More unions need to coordinate and actually create threat of a general strike. The UAW ending their contract on May Day and calling for others to do the same actually seems like a pretty good way to leverage power. I don’t think the government can move quick enough to block that kind of collective action.

            • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Biden literally signed an executive order blocking railway workers from striking. If he has that kind of authority and is willing to use it in that way, then all he has to do is make an executive order declaring all strikes illegal. Also, not trying to be a naysayer, but a general strike is a pipe dream. You can barely get people in the same union to cooperate, let alone multiple unions cooperating for a general.

      • sock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        yea! lets hope really hard and politicians might start taking hope as bribes for legislature

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bill Gates isn’t making the decisions anymore and hasn’t been for decades now

    • RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      And their decisions equate to: how can we employ the fewest number of people with the least benefits and make the most profit off what we’re selling?

      But definitely don’t consider that under- or unemployed people don’t have the money to spend on making those profits happen.