Will people here use/try Meta’s #threads when available? Would love to know the reasons or if it would be just for fun/curiosity.

The amount of data collected is insane imo.

  • bathrobe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    @Arotrios

    @m0bi13 @edu4rdshl

    Absolutely. I completely agree. I have Facebook because I have friends and family that basically require I use that to contact them. Never downloaded messager or any other thing. Not that they don’t have everything from Facebook anyway.

    But the person I was responding to wasn’t making the point that everything Zuck touches turns to shit and a money grab that torches user experience. Or that they are trying to stop any potential competitor or subsume them.

    They’re saying “look at all this data it’s going to harvest!!! Isn’t that INSANE?!?” When it’s literally the same almost every social media app on your phone does/has. There are a ton of arguments against anything zuck touches. Pretending the data harvesting is going to be new or groundbreaking is dishonest. Especially when, as I said, I would bet tiktok does all that and more. And it goes to a much worse actor.

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re saying “look at all this data it’s going to harvest!!! Isn’t that INSANE?!?” When it’s literally the same almost every social media app on your phone does/has.

      Just stopping by to point out that these are in no way mutually exclusive. Just because existing social media collects an insane amount of data, doesn’t mean the amount of data being collected by threads isn’t also insane.

      • bathrobe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Unaware7013

        Of course not

        Again the whole point of my comment is to express how UNORIGINAL it is what threads is doing

        It’s terrible. I want no part of it. But we shouldn’t treat it as a brand new slew of invasions when it is most certainly the same invasions most people happily take.

        But OP should make it seem like threads is going to be the first and only app that harvests that much, varied data. That’s dishonest.

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I never got the impression that this was new or different from the comment OP, just that the level of data gathered was insane/over broad. Which I think we can all agree is the case.

          Also, nothing in their post was incorrect, it’s a stalkers wet dream, have wild potential for government abuse, and people within the org would abuse it - both things that we know are factually accurate given the shit that’s gone down over the decades.

          ALSO also, just because the current apps gather an insane amount of data doesn’t mean the public is aware of the Faustian bargain they’ve agreed to. With new products/platforms being created, it’s best to point out to everyone just how much they’re giving up to join. I know I was one of those who had a Facebook for a while and bailed once I found out just how bad it was.

          • bathrobe@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            @Unaware7013

            i think we can all agree with everything you said there.

            I definitely got the impression from OP that you did not, but I am more than happy to admit I am not perfect, and I can take wrong meanings from things with the best of them.

            cause i think we are all saying the same thing - this is fucking horrible, and no one should use any app of platform that harvests data from you this way. I just wanted to make it clear that this level of harvesting is not new. it’s not, like, going beyond a new threshold. this is what everyone signs up for when they get tiktok or facebook or even messenger.

            we should be angry but not act shocked. you know what i mean?