DannyMac@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world · 2 年前Google caught placing big-brand ads on hardcore porn sites, report saysarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1463cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1463external-linkGoogle caught placing big-brand ads on hardcore porn sites, report saysarstechnica.comDannyMac@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square78fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.online
minus-squareSomething Burger 🍔@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前They are right, though. Noise pollution is real and harmful. If the venue can’t soundproof its walls then it should close.
minus-squareZak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·2 年前Noise pollution is harmful, but subject to an inverse-square law with regard to distance and not a big issue for people whose schedules are compatible with the venue’s hours. Seems to me who was there first should win that contest in most cases.
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前The only aspect which should be taken into consideration is noise ordinance laws, honestly. If the venue exceeds them, they’re clearly at fault.
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 年前Fun fact: where i live if you want to build residential next to an existing live venue, soundproofing is your problem.
They are right, though. Noise pollution is real and harmful. If the venue can’t soundproof its walls then it should close.
Noise pollution is harmful, but subject to an inverse-square law with regard to distance and not a big issue for people whose schedules are compatible with the venue’s hours. Seems to me who was there first should win that contest in most cases.
The only aspect which should be taken into consideration is noise ordinance laws, honestly. If the venue exceeds them, they’re clearly at fault.
Fun fact: where i live if you want to build residential next to an existing live venue, soundproofing is your problem.