• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    See, that works for a farm.

    I don’t see how it works for a $40 billion chip fabrication plant.

    • Arelin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Work isn’t just physical you know. Management, planning, etc is work too, and they’d get paid according to how many want to do them, and how hard they are.

      The difference is, like I said, that some greedy rich bastard who’d want to give as little of the profit as possible to the people actually making the product or providing the service wouldn’t own that means of production.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Simple. You know all those scientists that work at $40 billion chip plants? They would actually take the $40 billion and not some random suit who doesn’t do any of the actual work. Executive leadership is important, but it’s not worth 1000x the average worker’s salary.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So who builds it? Do you just get together with 40,000 of your friends and go “hey if everyone here chips in a million, we can compete with TSMC”?

        • Arelin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Organizing it through a Socialist government would probably be the easiest.

          And complaining about such a tiny challenge is hilarious lmao

        • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are examples of exactly this occuring regarding renewables, there are community funded battery/solar farms here in Aus.

          If it can be done on that scale, it can definitely be scaled up, it’s just a matter of willingness of the community.