• circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You mean the lawyers who coordinate national security related legal issues with law enforcement and intelligence? Yep, sure do, still doesn’t make them part of the military.

    I’d say it’s easier to take the L, but I understand you lack the self-awareness of your stupidity.

    Honestly, you’re the clearest example of Dunning-Kruger I’ve seen in quite a while. For that, I’m sorry.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forgot that DHS and the national guard aren’t military…

      You keep thinking that military contacts magically make a company a defense contractor and that they don’t have to follow the laws…the only reason you’re upset is because you are so far up the musk hate trains ass you can’t disassociate yourself from it.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Continuing to dunk on you feels like I’m abusing a special needs child, so I’m just going to retroactively agree with everything you’ve said, or ever will say.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes, I agree with you.

            DHS is definitely NOT a civilian law enforcement agency under the Executive Branch, and is definitely a part of the US military.

            Would you like me to edit the Wikipedia page to confirm this? It’ll take a while, because it does mention, multiple times, that they’re a civilian agency, but a promise is a promise.

            Maybe we can take turns, as I’m sure the moderators will keep changing it back to reflect the previous reality, you know, the one before I agreed with everything you said.