Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign, a sign of the president’s strength in uniting his party to have the backing of one of its most liberal members

    • whenigrowup356@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think we’d need a parliamentary system to end up with anything more than 2 parties being relevant. The 2 party system is sort of hard-wired into the way the house and Senate work. Ranked choice could have some cool effects on party primaries, though.

      • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, the two party system can be broken quite easily if any state switches to proportional representation. If a third party wins even a small number of congressional seats, it could make them the kingmaker in a divided house.

    • Licensed_to_ill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish. Ranked voting would be phenomenal. It’s obviously more democratic. Makes no sense not to have it. But politicians are dirty corrupt pieces of shit.

    • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this not the case in the US? Sorry for not being up to date on this as I don’t live in the US.

      • CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US Constitution specifies that each state must elect a senator and house of representative, must send electors to the Electoral College for President. It does not specify how.

        As such, some states have ranked choice voting. Others do not.

        • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah I see. It’s so weird how it works. Why not federate it so those laws are the same all over? I guess it’s a reason for it but in my eyes it sounds very ineffective.

          Also the whole electoral college sounds like s bad idea i guess. But it’s also a “safe guard” i guess?

          Going a bit OT on this one.

          • neanderthal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because that would require a constitutional amendment. The GOP would lose the most so not a single red state or GOP senator or congress member would vote for it. Amendments take a 2/3 majority or a constitutional convention, which requires 2/3 of the state governments to agree to it, which is even harder to pull off.

          • Bison1911@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            When the country was founded they needed to convince the state governments of a bunch of different states to agree to unify as a single nation.

            At that time state governments had more power and influence on the federal government than they do today. Senators were picked by the state government, not popularly elected as they are today, and it was left to the state governments to decide how they would conduct elections and select delegates to represent them in the Electoral College which is the actual body that picks the president.