Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Is it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1202cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.orghackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1202external-linkIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square131fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.orghackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarecosmicrookie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·edit-22 年前Why don’t we just skip 6G and just go straight to 7G
minus-squareMeeech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 年前If they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
minus-squareHule@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前I mean, you might have a point there. If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine. But… But… Seven ate nine. You ate eight! Seven nine! Waaaahhh!
minus-squareridethisbike@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前Nah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
minus-squareParanomaly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前They’ll skip 9 as that seems to be Kryptonite to tech. Both Microsoft and Apple decided to skip straight from 8 to 10 with Windows and iPhone respectively.
Why don’t we just skip 6G and just go straight to 7G
If they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
I mean, you might have a point there.
If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine.
But… But… Seven ate nine.
You ate eight!
Seven nine!
Waaaahhh!
Nah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
They’ll skip 9 as that seems to be Kryptonite to tech. Both Microsoft and Apple decided to skip straight from 8 to 10 with Windows and iPhone respectively.