• laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    My understanding is that most people like that in those cities don’t have cars because mass transit there is actually quite good, and keeping a car is excessively expensive for something they’ll rarely need

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, I was specifically referring to those two cities in the US because the comment I was responding to was mentioning them

      • stankmut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s mostly true in New York, but that’s the only city where I’ve heard that.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately all too many still do. I’ve known people in NYC who have cars, even if they rarely need them. When I lived in Boston, I needed a car despite using transit for all daily trips: some weeks I only used the car to move it for street cleaning

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people in those cities don’t have cars, but a lot do. Especially in the San Francisco Bay Area, which has worse public transportation than NY.

      Speaking as someone born and raised in SF, a shit load of apartment dwellers have cars. There are so many cars that you often can’t find a parking space near your building in the residential parts of town. Honestly, the main reason people get rid of their car is because the city has hit peak car capacity. You have to spend 30-60m looking for a spot in the vicinity of home.