I have to admire a company following through on the e-waste reduction by doing it’s own updates of the Android OS for an EOL chip. I just wish the fairphone 3 was actually more usable.
No one in the Android ecosystem can hold a candle to Apple’s software support timeline for the iPhone, but there is one company that comes the closest: Fairphone. Following in the footsteps of the Fairphone 2, the Fairphone 3 is also getting an Android-industry-best seven years of OS support. Fairphone continues to run circles around giant tech companies that have a lot more resources than it does, and it’s doing this even in the face of component vendors like Qualcomm dropping support for the phone’s core components.
The company announced today that the Fairphone 3, which was released in 2019, has had its support extended to 2026, making for seven years of updates. The company also just released Android 13 for the Fairphone 3. Google’s own 2019 phone, the Pixel 4, shut down support in October 2022.
Fairphone strives to make sustainable smartphones, designing its products to be repairable and also offering replacement parts for sale online. Part of that sustainability mission is an absolutely herculean effort to keep the Android updates flowing, even when Qualcomm drops critical software support for the SoC. Fairphone says the Snapdragon 632 SoC in the Fairphone 3 was only supported up to Android 11, so continuing to support the Fairphone 3 meant doing the upgrades all by itself.
For the normal update process, Google releases a new build to the Android open source repository, then SoC vendors like Qualcomm take those builds to create a “Board Support Package (BSP)” for each SoC, which includes updated drivers, proprietary blobs, and all the other bits of code that make the hardware work. Android phone manufacturers usually start their work from these SoC-supported builds of Android, so they only need to add support for their additional hardware. With Qualcomm dropping support for the Fairphone 3 SoC, Fairphone had to do the BSP update work on its own. Fairphone is the only Android phone manufacturer that does this. Everyone else shuts down support along with the SoC vendor.
While seven years of updates is incredible, the one thing you could ding Fairphone for is that the updates don’t arrive at a regular cadence. The company actually skipped Android 12 to deliver Android 13 due to all that “build the BSP yourself” work. Monthly security updates probably don’t arrive that regularly either. Still, Fairphone doing this with a fraction of the budget of larger companies shows that the usual excuses Android manufacturers make aren’t valid. Any company could offer longer support if it wanted to; they’re all just content forcing people to upgrade and creating e-waste.
If only they had the same titan chip as the Pixel so I could use GrapheneOS on it.
I’m using Calyx on the fairphone 4.
CalyxOS and GrapheneOS are vastly different
Can you elaborate how this is the case? Im decently unfamiliar with android and these systems.
I know they are both privacy focused, but I don’t know really what sets them apart.
If you look at the feature list of both you can gather quite a bit of differences.
https://grapheneos.org/features https://calyxos.org/features/list/
The last time I looked that these phones, they were pretty expensive.
I know they don’t have the same scale to take advantage of mass production, but they were significantly more expensive than a better specced android.
I hope this model is priced a bit better as I typically just get iPhone due to being able to get security updates for a long time and not have a phone that will slow down after just a year or two.
A big reason I skip on android is due to lack of long term updates.
They’re well worth the money. I got one because I couldn’t fix my Nokia’s USB because the glued-on screen had a small crack. A new screen cost about as much as the whole phone.
Not only is my Fairphone 3 much easier to repair, it seems to be much more durable as well. Been dropping it all the time and there isn’t a single scratch on the screen. I attribute it to the back that pops off when I drop it, absorbing most of the energy.
It really does seem like it’s one of those. Spend more now and save a lot in the long run.
If it were not for my cracked screen, I would have replaced my battery in my phone and held out for more time.
Additionally, where I live, they want me to leave my phone with them for up to a month while the part comes in.
I can’t go without a phone for a month. I literally use it 7 days a week for work.
Plus the cost of the screen is too much.
As long as I can put a custom ROM on it, I don’t really care about support.
I both agree and disagree. We know how to put a custom rom on it, but most users need to rely on the manufacturer for updates, so it’s important to have such support available.
Will this not laregly help third-party roms?
Custom roms arent a bandaid for poor support and at best they will only give you maybe a release or two more of quality support and thats IF the phone is popular to warrant an expansive and active developer community.
My experience with Rom support after the official releases dried up the remaining developers had a harder time porting over the new release and features. I know project treble and mainline have made this a lot easier for the rom community, but it still requires there be someone who cares about supporting your phone and a lot of times unless its a pixel, that someone is a college or high school student practicing coding in their spare time.
Shame its not available in my country
I’ve got one to sell if we could figure delivery out. How can I contact you?
Thanks for the offer, but i want to make sure this account stays anonymous.
I just wish the fairphone 3 was actually more usable
Just curious as an FP3 user myself, what is holding back the device’s usability for you?
Using LinageOS and it was just to buggy to deal with, even after several updates. The tap isn’t accurate, so I have trouble unlocking it. Many apps just fail to open or crash regularly. It’s just not consistent enough to be worth the eco engagement, nor up to par with the price.
