L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoA tiny radioactive battery could keep your future phone running for 50 yearswww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1300file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1300external-linkA tiny radioactive battery could keep your future phone running for 50 yearswww.techradar.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square90fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.online
A tiny radioactive battery could keep your future phone running for 50 years::A glowing horizon for phones
minus-squareAganim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoDepends, in my country ionization detectors have been banned over 20 years ago, you’ll mostly find optical / photoelectric detectors here.
minus-square_sideffect@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoI wonder if its because of a valid reason, or just a precaution
minus-squareNoedel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoIt’s probably safe until someone decides to go look what’s inside their smoke detector
Depends, in my country ionization detectors have been banned over 20 years ago, you’ll mostly find optical / photoelectric detectors here.
I wonder if its because of a valid reason, or just a precaution
It’s probably safe until someone decides to go look what’s inside their smoke detector