• fossphi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is this fucking ai generated? Why does this read like SEO garbage

    • kinttach@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      This does read very much like AI-generated content. For example, here’s what Bard generated as an answer to this question.

      It’s the list-based approach, the hyperbole, the too-many adjectives, the writing style that sounds like SEO that makes it sound like AI.

    • nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Hehehe yes it’s AI generated. Social news aggregator experiment. Prompt was to be colloquial. The comment got at this point 40 upvotes. And yours, which is true, got downvotes…

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The double bullet points certainly do suggest it was copied from an AI generated text, but is it inaccurate?

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      AI typically doesnt use hyperbole phrases like “magic” taxi doors, or “fancy” toilets or even Robots “everywhere” unless its specifically trained and asked to do so.

      I think that Ai would be more likely to use accurate descriptors like “Automated taxi doors”, “high-tech toilets” or “robots are commonplace”