Like… is there any law against it?

  • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    11 months ago

    In Germany:

    When using vehicles, unnecessary noise and avoidable exhaust pollution are prohibited. In particular, it is prohibited to run vehicle engines unnecessarily and to close vehicle doors excessively loudly. Unnecessary driving to and fro within built-up areas is prohibited if it causes a nuisance to others.

    §30 (1), StVO

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        11 months ago

        Noise is a public nusince. I definitely wouldn’t want my neighbours constantly slamming their doors at night. I doubt you are going to get fined if you are slamming your door occasionally or in the middle of the woods.

        Laws exist to ensure that we can all live peacefully together. I think most people agree that excessive noise is more of a negative than a positive. Most places have similar curfew laws where excessive noise at night is not allowed.

        • rab@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I guess I’ve just never even heard of that situation happening in real life so it’s weird seeing it explicitly written in a law

          • isles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Some laws are reactionary and some are preemptory. Laws are, most simply, a codified agreement on how we live.

  • GreyShuck@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    11 months ago

    You’d need to refuel at some point and I expect that refuelling whilst in motion would probably hit some legal issues.

    And then, assuming that you overcame that, in the UK at least, you’d need at MOT test at some point, which would have to be at an approved test centre, so 3 years at the absolute max - although I expect tyres etc would need attention before that.

  • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    11 months ago

    Where do you live, OP?

    In Denmark it goes in the same category as not driving when the light is green or keeping to the left on the highway.

    While you seldomly see someone get fined for it, taking more than two turns in the roundabout is considered an obstruction of traffic, and therefore illegal.

      • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Depending on the definition, you’re not obscuring traffic if you’re driving 60kmh in the fastlane either, or if only you manage to get over the green light because of your tardiness, as traffic is still flowing, just very, very slow.

        Either way, you’ll be slowing down traffic and get in the way of other drivers, unless you are the only person on the road.

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The point of a roundabout is specifically that one must not stop, that is their design. A circle of perpetual motion. Certainly stopping in a roundabout would qualify as obstruction. I do not see how, even on a crowded day, making more than two passes in a roundabout while remaining in motion qualifies as “obstruction.”

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            You know to get on a roundabout they can’t just phase through your car? If you don’t exit in a timely manner you’re taking up space people need to get into the roundabout and let it work. So staying is obstructing traffic.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 months ago

    In Norway, there’s a specific “law” against causing dangerous situations by being inattentive, unpredictable, inconsiderate or reckless. Needless to say, it goes unenforced a lot, but if you wanted to nail someone for driving like a dipshit, it’d be a decent catch-all.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 months ago

    In my country you are only allowed three rounds max. But I have not heard of any case where someone was fined for such a “crime”.

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Illegal in my country, as you are disturbing traffic. Potentially even preventing emergency services to operate. Might be fine if you are alone though

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      i mean, if everyone was staying on the roundabout… but if you have one guy goin round and round, there should be plenty of interleave for everyone else. how would it be disruptive?

      im an ignorant american, just curious

  • jafffacakelemmy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’d be called ‘obstructing traffic’. Police sometimes grab boy-racers along the sea-front near my home for it. There’s no specific law saying you can’t wait at a T-junction indefinitely, and i usually get stuck behind the ones that do. :-(

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    It depends how many tickets your mum bought. Even then, the owner is bound to close up at some point to go home.
    Maybe have a go on the swings in the meantime?

  • invertedspear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Obviously it’s all going to be dependent on local laws, and depending on their vagueness the attitude of the cop that eventually has to deal with you. Here we have a catch-all ticket for “wasting finite resources” for cops to use when they don’t know what else to ticket you for. Originally it was to stop cruising, but I’m pretty sure no one has gone cruising since gas was $0.25 a gallon. Also I’m wondering if I could fight such a ticket if I can prove I charge my car with 100% solar.

  • 0xb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    Probably there are many places with no specific provisions against that but surely that would count for authorities as some sort of disruption of traffic, which are intentionally vaguely defined to cover such ambiguous eventualities.

    A shame, I think it would be neat.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      In major cities in America, just as an example, there is often a statue against “cruising” which is usually defined as passing by the same point more than X number of times in Y span of time. These laws are ostensibly aimed at harassing the (black) “car culture” people while they’re showing off their customized vehicles in the 'hood. It’s kind of like the vehicular version of anti-loitering laws. But you could probably apply it to OP’s case if you were twisted enough.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    No mention of roundabout or traffic circles in Ontario’s Highway Traffic Act, but the rule that governs are the yield signs around the outside that stipulate that traffic in the roundabout has right of way.

    From the Driver’s handbook:

    Keep moving: Once you are in the roundabout, do not stop except to avoid a collision; you have the right-of-way over entering traffic. Do not change lanes while in the roundabout. If in the inside lane and you miss your exit, you must continue around until you meet your exit again.

    This suggests, in Ontario at least, you could stay in the roundabout forever without breaking the rules.

    Edit: If you’re not bothering anyone doing that, then it should be alright, but if your perpetual roundabout traversing is getting in the way of other people trying to use the roundabout, then it could be considered careless driving:

    Careless driving

    130 (1) Every person is guilty of the offence of driving carelessly who drives a vehicle or street car on a highway without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway. 2017, c. 26, Sched. 4, s. 17.

  • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t see why not. I often joke about doing so, and have once or twice gone around and around, but the thrill quickly wears off after two or three passes.

    I would love to watch someone commit to the bit and keep on until the authorities take issue.