• Doombot1
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    10 months ago

    The solution to global warming, then, is clearly to just set up a massive ring of fans all pointed in the same direction in a ring around the North Pole, to keep the jet stream going

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s a bit like the investigation into whether lethal bear attacks are because of their teeth or their claws - probably really interesting, but not critical to the question of avoiding the bear.

    • Slovene@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I was led to believe it’s both. Global warming causes ice loss which contributes to global warming which causes more ice loss which contributes to global warming which causes more ice loss …

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Interesting. I would love to work on that kind of data model, as there is an interesting thing to point out with the movement of the polar vortex:
      It dips further south to follow along land mass.

      I wonder if the wind currents have an easier time maintaining speed along flat surfaces or if the water being warmer causes pockets of higher pressure further north than usual pushing the vortex to be more unstable looking.

      It feels like it makes sense that the current would be much more stable along a surface that is more consistent and thus loss of ice smoothing the surface would cause it to wobble but inertia still remains the same meaning it needs to push down elsewhere where there is less resistance.

      So I would lean towards ice loss as a cause of changing polar vortex stability but I kinda gave up that ability to do anything about this or study such things a while ago.

    • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah I’ve actually lost faith in 100% of folks in 2024 who still think it’s a scam. I used to think it was just boomers, it’s not. Every climate change related post from NASA on their social media accounts is literally full of young people making fun of them for ‘lying to the public’ and how it’s all a hoax. There’s no depth to these people, we truly live in a society full of complete morons who will believe in a conspiracy theory because of a 5 minute badly edited YouTube video, but refuse to trust anything that is widely accepted in the scientific community because of their need to feel important, intelligent, and ‘in’ on something that the rest of the world isn’t in on.

      • mmagod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        the fellow students in school growing up that always blew off paying attention in school and disrupting class didn’t just disappear… sure i saw less of them when i wasn’t confined to those public grade school walls, but it’s been a harsh realization for me as I’m seeing them again as adults buying into and spreading the misinformation.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I just hope we’re not seeing the start of a shutdown of the North Atlantic current, which is likely what led to the Younger Dryas ice age, which marked a dramatic climate shift and widespread extinction event over just a couple of decades:

    The change was relatively sudden, took place over decades, and resulted in a decline of temperatures in Greenland by 4–10 °C (7.2–18 °F), and advances of glaciers and drier conditions over much of the temperate Northern Hemisphere. A number of theories have been put forward about the cause, and the hypothesis historically most supported by scientists is that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, which transports warm water from the Equator towards the North Pole, was interrupted by an influx of fresh, cold water from North America into the Atlantic.

    Right now, it’s looking like that may have already started: Study: Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. If that’s the case, things will become very hot and then abruptly freeze, not over the course of a century, but virtually overnight.

    e: better link

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thing I keep thinking about, and I feel like I’ve never been able to properly communicate, is that the machines our society runs on are built to run in a certain temperature range.

      The 2021 texas winter fiasco was a perfect demonstration of what happens when we try to run a society’s machinery outside of it’s expected temperature range. Yes, the ERCOT goofballs were trying to save money by narrowing that expected operating range because “It never gets that cold” and “It never gets that hot”, but my badly articulated point still stands - a system was made to operate in a temperature range outside of it’s capability, and it started to fail. They were minutes away from losing very expensive and hard to replace equipment. What we don’t want is for one of the more competently-run power grids in the world to start to buckle due to temperatures, because the same thing that happened in texas could happen on a larger scale.

      And that’s just talking about the power grid. Anything with a heat exchanger in it, including your car and air conditioner and all the refrigeration that is needed to keep everyone fed, is designed to run in a certain temperature range, and will stop working if you run it outside of that range for too long.

      But wait, we can just design stuff to run in a wider temperature range! We certainly can. But we would have to redesign everything that moves heat around.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      When you stop and actually think about our situation you realise how thin our operating margins are, we are at the mercy of whatever the planet does and our safety is subject to immediate dismissal should the conditions change. Worse of course are the random cosmic whims which could wipe us out instantly at any time e.g. comets, the sun going weird, etc.

      • PotjiePig@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a thought that gives me comfort that we, as a species, will be evicted before we can do irreparable damage so that life can continue to evolve without us.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The day after tomorrow was related, but relied on a no longer mainstream idea that the Arctic vortex could become a whole northern hemisphere storm, so big it would liquify nitrogen in its central low

        We really hope that’s not a thing that can happen. It would render most of the northern hemisphere dead

    • slingstone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is there any resource for forecasting what will likely occur in a given area? I don’t see how we can stop climate change now, so I want to prepare my family for it.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not that I’m aware of. From what I understand, that scenario would affect the entire planet.

        • slingstone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, but the changes to weather patterns will vary from location to location, right?

          This is what I mean:

          Warming is already occurring in all areas of the globe, but models of future temperatures show that the changes will not be distributed equally. Polar regions and land areas are expected to see the largest temperature changes.

          IPCC Working Group I, 2021

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Right, but if that current shuts down, that means the transfer of warm and cold currents that power weather patterns across the entire northern hemisphere will be disrupted.

            The last time that happened, the entire northern hemisphere basically froze over. If you live north of the equator, whether it’s North America, Europe, or Asia, the result would be similar: no more warm seasons and freezing to the point of glaciation, from what I understand. I’m not a climatologist, though.

  • BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    reference

    I was trying to look up why less polar ice causes shifts in the jet stream and this article cites an active debate around our understanding on this.

    The tweet does not really address that point, and makes the cause and effect sound definitive.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      What, are you saying a website called X where I can easily share both amateur porn, shitpost, and fight with other keyboard warriors isn’t a solid source for factual information? smh what are you talking about

      Next you’re going to tell me that drinking diesel fuel is bad for my longevity or something.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Xcretion says that less ice “is consistent with” a weaker jet stream, which does not imply a casual relationship. If A causes B and Y, then B is consistent with Y; or, more accurately, we can produce a useful model of the system that includes both less ice and a weaker jet stream, and have it be internally consistent.

    • Pendulum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Which is the flaw of social media science these past few years. Theories evolve as new data is presented and new hypotheses are formed. The average twitter denizen won’t have that, no sir, and will with glee smack you with an outdated textbook with equal zeal as a Bible basher.

      “FACTS DONT FUGGING CHANGE YOU BIGOT” == “THE WORLD IS ONLY 6,000 YEARS OLD SAYS SO IN THE BIBLE”

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    HEY!!! Get your science and facts out of here!

    ~ ~Places fingers in ears and closes eyes~ ~ laalalalalalalal

  • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Y’all ready to be gouged for survival items until money becomes irrelevant?

    P.S. ‘A Capitalist Apocalypse’ would be a fun title for a political comedy song.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even as the US hits record setting lows, the temperature of the planet as a whole remains above average. If it’s -20°F across the entire US, how hot must the rest of the planet be?

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Weather is too hot? It’s because of global warming.

    Weather too cold? Also global warming.

    I’m not denying global warming or climate change, I’m just playing Devil’s advocate to show how a climate denier might view this.

    It just looks dumb when they claim that any/all evidence proves their point. Maybe it’s just cold because it’s January? December was very mild where I live and it’s supposed to be unusually warm next week. I suppose that also proves global warming?

    • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s why people moved away from global warming and use climate change.

      Yes, overall the earth is warming but that destabilization affects the climate making summers hotter, winters colder, storms stronger etc.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          10 months ago

          The planet is warming overall. This causes climate change as the polar ice melts. It means more extremes in temperatures and localized colder temperatures, and OP explained why. OP wasn’t wrong, and you’re being deliberately obtuse.

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        smh they should have moved to global cooling, then we wouldn’t be in this situation. Next time you are upset about the temperature just know that there were rows of homes just waiting there, but nooooo you had to be equal and give climate change a try. See how that worked out don’tcha?

    • oehm@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thats why it’s been called climate change for decades now and not global warming.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        As a natural pedant, I have to point out that that’s not quite true. Decades ago, people talked about global warming (due to the greenhouse effect) because we feared that it would lead to major climate change.

        Then, it led to major climate change. Now we talk about that. Global warming is still a thing, it’s just the effects have upstaged it as a topic.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      If this is you playing Devil’s Advocate, then I have to voice my concern that the Devil has retained a lawyer that makes Trump’s attorneys look competent by comparison.

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Charlotte Richards was a good lawyer!

        spoiler

        And I wholeheartedly love anyone who gets that ❤️

    • Perfide@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Weather is too hot? It’s because of global warming.

      Weather too cold? Also global warming.

      Literally yes. It’s not our fault if people are too stupid to realize weather =! climate, are too skeptical to trust the science. Regardless of whether people believe it, it’s literally the facts of the matter that global warming is the cause of these extreme weather events.

      I’m really confused what your point is. Climate change deniers looking at objective facts and rejecting them because they can’t comprehend a warmer climate could cause colder weather means they are fucking stupid, not that the facts are wrong. We don’t need to play advocate for dumbassery

      Maybe it’s just cold because it’s January?

      January had been super mild near me, average lows in the 30s with actual average being like 50, up until this past week when the cold front came in from the north and literally overnight temps dropped to the negatives. I was closely monitoring weather radars this week, I literally watched the cold front coming in… and look at that, the cold front has finally mostly passed over me and it’s once again in the comparatively balmy 30s, and supposed to be even warmer next week. Huh, guess it’s not just because it’s January, who knew?

      The whole winter has been super mild actually, besides literally this weeks cold front it’s been warmer on average than it would’ve been in early Autumn here 15ish years ago. We used to frequently get the first blizzard of the year in October, now it takes an abnormal cold front coming down from the literal arctic to even get a blizzard at all, in January! That’s fucking alarming.

    • Sticky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re getting downvoted to oblivion, but I do see and agree with your point: “Branding matters”

      A significant portion of the population will not rub two brain cells together to understand the “warming -> change” connection, as reasonable as it is. Same thing with the “defund the police” slogan. Yes, when you understand the concept you can see the meaning, but for those that don’t bother to understand the concept, the “brand name” is the beginning and the end of thought applied. When the “brand name” is easily attackable, the idea is dead so far as they’re concerned.

      As frustrating as it is, persuasive arguments need to also appeal to those who are persuaded by quips and jokes as well as those who are persuaded by logic and reason. Unfortunately “Global Warming”, the “old brand” is still sticking around, and still able to be joked away by many people, hence the reason for the image post in the first place.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      weather is a heat engine, more heat in the air makes weather more extreme and powerful. Colds colder amd further south. hots hotter and further north, etc

      just like nitrous in a car engine makes it more extreme and powerful

      Its not a hard concept to grab if you dont have a cultish politically motivated “NUH UH” mindset to anything you hear that didnt come from the 3 lying fucking conmen you listen to ( general you, not you specific)

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The problem with that position is that it’s anti-scientific. If someone is scientifically illiterate then their opinion doesn’t count anymore than my opinion on the supremacy of reading Tolstoy in the original Russian. I can’t read Russian so it doesn’t matter what I say. If, however, the majority of bilingual Russian/English speakers tell me that the best way to enjoy War and Peace is to learn Russian, I will believe them, even if I don’t bother taking the time to learn that language.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why play devil’s advocate? Why advocate for the devil in the first place?

      Instead of trying to mask any ignorance or opinions of your own, simply share your actual opinion, and don’t try to think or speak for others, please.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, still way to many people being contrarious just to help push a side they dont even believe in for the reason of… They think it’s annoying that other people care?
        Truly a great use of time. /s

        Truly, it might just be that they believe what they pretend to not and just want someone to confirm they are wrong because otherwise it’s such not a worthwhile position to hold unless we are all getting paid to think about it.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t poke the echo chamber too hard. The mods might ban you for reasonable discussion.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The reason it goes both ways is the heat puts more energy in the weather. My country is getting rain like it was a la Niña year, in an el niño year. Air currents move and America gets snow

      The climate is changing. That affects weather. Weather is chaotic, small influences can have large effects. Climate change is a large influence.