Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    The prompters. That is easy enough. If I cut butter with a knife it’s okay, if I cut a person with a knife - much less so. Knife makers can’t be held responsible for that, it’s just nonsense.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      If you try to bread with an autonomous knife and the knife kills you by stabbing you in the head. Is it solely your fault?

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        That depends on whether the autonomous knife is designed dangerously and it’s a common occurrence, or whether I was being a moron and essentially rigged it to stab me, akin to asking for copyright material from an AI and getting it (scene from a movie, characters part of intellectual property etc)

        • Ross_audio@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          10 months ago

          So you’re saying if it’s easy to accidentally get copyright images out of this AI by prompting ordinary worlds. Then the AI designers have some questions to answer.

            • Ross_audio@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              10 months ago

              “The Joker” is a generic description of a character. Going back to medieval courts.

              If the result is a copyrighted version of that character that’s not the promoters fault.

              That’s the fault of the ones who compile the training data.