𝚐𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚒𝚎@h4x0r.host to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoMozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are “as painful as possible” for Firefoxwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square176fedilinkarrow-up11.35Kcross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmit.onlineimockedapple@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.35Kexternal-linkMozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are “as painful as possible” for Firefoxwww.theverge.com𝚐𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚒𝚎@h4x0r.host to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square176fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmit.onlineimockedapple@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fansfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·edit-211 months agono, its because they come up with all sorts of egregious and nonsensical arguments to defend apple no matter the shitty thing they do. if an apple product was killing babies they would bend over backwards to justify how it cant be apples fault. their marketing did a number on peoples head, in a scary fucking way. no way i would ever justify the shitty things google does just because I use a fork of their os on my shitty phone.
minus-squareEggyhead@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12·11 months ago they come up with all sorts of egregious and nonsensical arguments In the first sentence, and then if an apple product was killing babies in the very next… If Apple users are horrible, logic like this ensures that “fanboy” haters remain a tier worse.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-211 months agoyou are bending over backwards to misinterpret what i said, and you prove my point somewhat.
minus-squareabhibeckert@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·11 months agoThey didn’t bend over at all. You literally made a ridiculous argument while complaining about other people doing that. You really think if Apple killed babies people would be ok with that? Of course you don’t.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-211 months agoexaggeration is commonly used as a figure of speech.
no, its because they come up with all sorts of egregious and nonsensical arguments to defend apple no matter the shitty thing they do.
if an apple product was killing babies they would bend over backwards to justify how it cant be apples fault.
their marketing did a number on peoples head, in a scary fucking way.
no way i would ever justify the shitty things google does just because I use a fork of their os on my shitty phone.
In the first sentence, and then
in the very next…
If Apple users are horrible, logic like this ensures that “fanboy” haters remain a tier worse.
you are bending over backwards to misinterpret what i said, and you prove my point somewhat.
They didn’t bend over at all. You literally made a ridiculous argument while complaining about other people doing that.
You really think if Apple killed babies people would be ok with that? Of course you don’t.
exaggeration is commonly used as a figure of speech.