Yemen: US Air Strike that has Left Dozens of Migrants Dead Must Be Investigated

Ah good, that accounts for 1 out of the 33 articles about Yemen written since the US and Israel started indiscriminately bombing the country for daring to act against their genocide of Palestine, the rest of which are criticizing “the Huthi de facto authorities” (i.e. the legitimate government of Yemen) for various perceived infractions.

And of course, the headline is not about any of the strikes on residential apartment blocks or civilian airports or seaports, but about hitting a migrant detention facility, so that the article can go on to spend half its length complaining about “the Huthi de facto authorities” and their detainment of migrants, their ‘restrictions on independent investigation’, and their ‘crackdown on civic spaces’.

The takeaway of the article, which pervades its entire language and tone, is that the US military needs to more carefully select and investigate its targets when bombing foreign countries, so that they only kill and destroy ‘legitimate military targets’ and don’t accidentally harm the poor innocents who these tyrannical foreign brutes are already terrorizing, implicitly suggesting the US is somehow a thoughtful moral actor that gives even a single fuck about killing civilians, and that its enemies do actually deserve to be murdered but only in the right way with cleaner, more nuanced weaponry.

If you want them to write more reports, consider supporting them, instead of complaining.

They get all the support they need from the NED and CIA, what I want is for them to write NO reports so I never have to see another mealy-mouthed, wounded innocence “speaking truth to power” shitsmear of lies and insinuations against whoever dares to resist the will of the US State Department, when the overwhelming majority of human rights violations in the world today are very very clearly committed by the US Empire and its global proxy forces.

The analysis found that of the 78 concluded cases under the NSL at least 66 (84.6%) involved legitimate expression that should not have been criminalized according to international standards

These cases fall well short of the high threshold required for criminalization under international standards.

These people were wrongly criminalized! According to their country’s laws? Well no, according to totally undefined “”“international standards”“”. Are we going to apply those standards to, for instance, checking whether people imprisoned in the US are ‘wrongly criminalized’? Of course not.

After checking the most recent ten pages of articles, out of 120 entries there were five about the US, not a single one of which had anything to do with the indiscriminate mass arrests of immigrants. There are as many unique news stories about the new law in Georgia requiring foreign NGOs to disclose their sources of funding, as there are about the US in total. If you search ‘ICE’, there is one (1) article that mentions it in the headline, which when sorted by ‘Most Relevant’ is the NINTH article to appear, and which is complaining about the National Guard mobilization against the protests against ICE, not even ICE itself.

“Amnesty International” is an attack dog of the US State Department that has no purpose but to generate headlines bashing the enemies of the Empire, with the very occasional half-hearted jab at the most obviously inexcusable crimes of the US and Europe to maintain their cover as some sort of impartial third-party. On their ‘Take Action’ page, “Join the fight for freedom [sic] in Hong Kong” is displayed before “Lift the blockade on Gaza and stop the genocide”, which should tell you everything you need to know about their priorities.

Coincidentally, its maximum accurate range and its penetration depth are about the same distance

What are you talking about?? The baseline of this site is Let’s Go Bomb Tel Aviv. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a single person say that Israel should exist in any form whatsoever.

And the withdrawal of US support, if that can even happen without a total US imperial collapse, would be the most significant step towards that happening. You seem to have an idealistic assumption that somehow the Israelis could just will themselves into being able to fight through their fanaticism, but you can’t will bombs, missiles and interceptors into existence. Only the US can supply Israel with those at the volume they need, and withdrawal of the US would basically end Israeli material capacity to defend themselves from Iran, and shortly after that the ability to fight at all.

Oh, so Israelis are not allowed to leave? They’re not allowed to travel freely but are confined to one place? Like some sort of… hostages?

You know, when I’m the good team, I usually make sure to have my intelligence services run from a skyline-dominating black obelisk

There’s a on exactly this, it’s episode 14 and it came out in 2017, which even further demonstrates how this is an evergreen lie.

THIS SLIME is TOO GLOOBY for WOKE MILLENNIALS

‘Munitions’ usually refers to the things being shot out of a weapon, i.e. bullets, bombs, missiles (in NATO terminology, ‘munitions’ specifically means explosives, as opposed to bullets.)

‘Ordnance’ refers to heavy weapons generally, mainly artillery pieces, but also sometimes to smaller weapons like mortars and portable missile launchers, and confusingly in some cases also the shells and missiles they fire. You would never usually refer to smaller weapons like pistols or rifles as ‘ordnance’ unless you were being ironic.

Bruh; I posted this six months ago, how did you even find it? Did you scroll my entire comment history until you could find a single thing to concern-troll at?

Anyway, the “”“Hong Kong protests”“” were started in response to a security bill that would make it easier to extradite criminals back to the mainland, as there were several loopholes in the way mainland and Hong Kong criminal codes lined up that needed to be closed. The incident that made it clear this was necessary, was a criminal who murdered and dismembered his pregnant girlfriend, fled to Hong Kong and then couldn’t be returned home to face trial.

So, keeping that guy from facing justice was the context in which everything else has to be considered. The “”“protests”“” were deeply unpopular among the majority of the residents of Hong Kong. The protesters themselves, as well as being frequently racist against mainlanders, displayed an extreme nostalgia for the British control of Hong Kong, waving UK flags and writing their protest signs in English (the most obvious tell that a “”“protest”“” is actually for the benefit of foreign audiences rather than being an organic movement of local people). It’s important to note that under British rule… there was no democracy. Afterwards, a lot of “”“protesters”“” “”“fled”“” to the UK, where a large number of them now live in destitution due to the UK’s atrocious cost of living and the fact they’re no longer useful imperial puppets.

In the first three days of the George Floyd uprisings, US police arrested more people than HK police had in six months. By the end of the first week US police had also killed more people (directly involved in the protests that is, on average daily US police murders would constitute a civil war in any other country) than had died during the HK protests, three in total: one protester who fell off a rooftop, one old man who was a street-sweeper that got hit in the head with a brick thrown by a protester, and one mainlander businessman who was doused in gasoline and set on fire by protesters.

Also in attendance, unaccountably, were various Ukrainian neonazis who, for some reason, were super invested in these astroturfed protests about a highly specific local legal matter.

Here’s some bozo from the Azov battalion, the most vicious of the neonazi paramilitaries, posing in Hong Kong (and him again later, after he was partially denazified while persecuting Russian-speaking Ukrainians in the Donbas region). Sending in Ukrainian fascist mercenaries is usually a good sign that the imperial intelligence apparatus is involved.

Lastly, not only do the Chinese people feel (correctly) that their political system is more democratic than the people of the UK think theirs is, they also think democracy is more important than the population of the UK does

So maybe take this into account when your white chauvinistic ass starts spouting regurgitated bullshit about what other people around the world, people your empire subjugated, really want.

Also “liberation” motherfucker if you were born then, you would have enthusiastically joined the volksturm

Germany needed to have the nazism beaten out of it and the thrashing it got still wasn’t enough

YOU HAVE THE INTERIOR MINISTRY

COUP YOURSELF

You’re right, their ingrained ideology filters out information like that before it ever even reaches their brain.

“I have created a thinking machine!”

look inside

it’a a mechanical turk

The capitalists built a wall around the world to keep their enslaved masses trapped in servitude

I can work in 110+ languages using AI

Yes, I too can copy and paste things into Google Translate

Verily, seems this to thee, the mien of such a man as may his course, presagely, chart?