European 🇪🇺

  • 555 Posts
  • 1.17K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle




  • Basically:

    " But, yeah, Andy King has a point that when universities, journals, and other institutions support the bad behavior, that’s not good. That doesn’t help at all. In all seriousness, you gotta feel a little sorry for Harvard Business School: they’ve had so many of these scandals now. It’s not like Duke and MIT business schools, which just had one scandal each–actually it was the same scandal for the two of them."

    I’ve no knowledge of this publication, this King character and so on. But personally, I don’t have a very high regard of higher learning centres nor especially good experiences. And that was some time ago. It takes a lot to criticise institutions, and it’s worth doing for the better of the world. But you definitely pay a price and therefore my advise -which nobody asked for- would be to honestly ask yourself whether this is the hill you choose to die on. And take it from there.










  • Forgive me, I’m new here (and I’m not OP).

    Hi and welcome here. You mean new in Fediverse, Lemmy or this community? Hope you enjoy it here.

    Well indeed the rule isn’t specifically stated, but using the correct title makes not only sense ( rule 1 -3) but is the proper format imo. If I click on an OP title to find out it’s something else, it’s misleading and I’m wasting my time.

    Comments and opinions can be important and valid, they can be made under content like a note or under the comments section. That’s how most do it.








  • Or like stated here EU Advocates for stronger EU harmonization argue that a unified market is essential for creating viable pan-European investment models, particularly for high-capacity fixed networks and future mobile technologies. Industry groups have consistently called for longer, more predictable spectrum licensing and consistent award conditions across the EU, arguing that national divergences impede deployment and escalate costs.

    And, per July 2025 joint statement by consumer and civil society groups urged the Commission to preserve robust net neutrality within the DNA and voiced concerns regarding proposals linked to the “fair share” debate, including ideas for dispute-resolution systems between telecom operators and online services. Hence, Europe’s commitment to the principle of net neutrality is reaffirmed, mandating equal treatment for all Internet traffic by operators, a stance maintained despite industry calls for a less restrictive regulatory environment.