• @Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 days ago

      But you do since you just guess. I quote known sources, and you pull shit out your ass.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        178 days ago

        Please explain why Putin would endorse the person who says that Ukraine should win the war over the person who won’t say that.

        • @Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 days ago

          I don’t need to explain anything. Again, I’m just citing facts, and you’re guessing. But honestly, how much do you think your armchair analytics are really worth? Or anyone’s for that matter?

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            108 days ago

            I just cited facts too.

            Harris wants Russia out of Ukraine.

            Trump refuses to say what he wants Russia to do.

            Why would Putin sincerely endorse Harris? I think you know the answer is that he wouldn’t.

            • @Murvel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 days ago

              Because you, quote ‘don’t live under a rock’, was that the citation you consider a fact?

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                108 days ago

                Again:

                Harris says Ukraine should win.

                Trump will not say who should win.

                This happened last night. I heard it with my own ears.

                So, again, why would Putin support the person who wants him to lose the war? Because, again, I think you know the answer.

                • arefx
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  38 days ago

                  They could actually just be dumb and ignorant, but I think we both know they have their motives.

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    88 days ago

                    My source of what? Those two claims? Again, the debate last night. Putin’s obviously bullshit endorsement of Harris? I can give you a source, but I’m not sure what your whole point here is if you didn’t know about that.

          • YeetPics
            link
            fedilink
            English
            47 days ago

            I don’t need to explain anything.

            Don’t be coy; you simply cannot.

            You exist in bad faith, this goes so far beyond debate at this point lmao

          • @papertowels
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            There’s a big difference between citing facts and citing a statement. You likely have no evidence that the statement is a fact, besides taking the ex-kgb leader of an adversarial nations word at face value, which…does sound a little silly when you say it out loud like that, doesn’t it? Keep in mind this nation has definitely messed with our elections in the past too lol.

            • @Murvel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 days ago

              The statement is the fact, and I put no more value to it than that. Make of that what you will, I really don’t care

              • @papertowels
                link
                English
                3
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                You are citing a statement, and it is a fact that the statement was said, but the content of that statement is not a fact because there’s very little evidence to support it being a fact. Lies exist, especially from the election meddling, ex KGB foreign adversary national leader types.