• Egon [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t worry about it. That user has a tendency to misinterpret communication and then stick to that argument, nitpicking select parts of what you write in order to unveil whatever it is he believes you’re conceiling from him. Best thing to do is just not engage.
    It’s great when it’s against chuds, but then again it often ends up just being someone who disagrees with him about a minor thing.

    • @DrPop
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      He seems like a great advocate for this instance. /S

      I decided not to forsake an entire instance because of one person. He’s too hypocritical so I’m probably just gonna block him if he engaged with me again.

      • Egon [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I mean, I’m glad people aren’t letting bigotry slide, but yeah it’s not super nice how a misunderstanding can devolve to weird antagonism. I’m sorry that happened to you.

        • @DrPop
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I do wish they’d at least acknowledge that they jumped to conclusions like I tried to explain. More for them then me.

          • Egon [they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Yeah, you and me both. It’s a whole thing, trust me when I say the best you can do is just not engage. I’ve tried to point out to them before that they seem to do this, and that they habour grudges as a result, but it just ends up with him calling me a concern troll, or saying that I’m accusing him of being mentally ill or something.
            Consider using the block feature.