Nobody could have predicted this. I have my doubts even when they call it “spying equipment” or whatever considering Chinese claim it was a meteorological balloon, certainly no doubt they would try to paint those tools as such.

    • @AccmRazr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      You clearly didn’t read the article. It WAS a spy balloon but it appears the spy equipment wasn’t turned on. So no information was gathered.

      • AlicePraxis [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 year ago

        the article presents zero evidence that it’s a “spy balloon”, just some dipshit general saying that it is. we know the U.S. military regularly lies about its enemies, so his word is worth nothing

        did you ever stop to ask why a supposed “spy balloon” would be so large and easily noticed?

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        731 year ago

        lib@lemm.ee

        And you read the article yet you didn’t even quote the funny bit.

        Martin said, “On paper, it looks like this colossal mismatch – one of this country’s most sophisticated jet fighters against a balloon with a putt-putt motor. Was it a sure thing?”

      • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        681 year ago

        Somehow we’ve managed to find the first human being to function without a single neuron firing.

        A brain exists, but nothing is occuring within. No electrical signals, no neural activity.

        And yet they manage to post anyway

        • star_wraith [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 year ago

          I’m still getting used to federation. I saw that comment, didn’t look at the poster’s name, and assumed it was just sarcasm.

      • zephyreks [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        The article makes no claim as to the nature of the balloon. The author is very careful about that. It’s a balloon that didn’t collect any intelligence nor transmit any data. How, exactly, would you define a spy balloon? It’s starting to sound like your threshold for “spy balloon” is “launched by some Chinese person,” which is probably more than a little racist.