• @Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    That is the opposite of what this country was built on; freedom of religion.

    Being religious should not disqualify anyone, but if you push past separation of church and state then and only then should you be disqualified

    • spaceghotiOP
      link
      English
      521 year ago

      I’m pretty sure that was the point of the original comment.

    • @Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      351 year ago

      Being too religious should absolutely disqualify you, just like believing the world is flat or any number of other complete nonsense should disqualify you.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      So… you’re saying ….

      If they’re too religious… they should be disqualified…

      The line for you being that they try to force their beliefs on others. Which, personally, I view as a given when their campaign platform includes “Christian Values” (or any other religion’s values,)

      If you can’t make a secular argument…. It doesn’t belong in government.

    • @Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      The Puritans came here to seperate THEIR church from the state, after that it became them imposing their religion on natives.

      The actual country’s founding in 1776 was. Far from religious, and many of the founding fathers were not religious or outright anti religion

    • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Bring religious should be a disqualification. You have a higher master you serve. You can’t be trusted to put the country and the citizens first.

    • @ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Religious beliefs are not disqualifying, but if that’s your whole way of being, you should not hold public office. Render unto Caesar.