• @sunbeam60
    link
    282 months ago

    JMAP support would make a huge difference to expand the only open/free (as in speech) competition Exchange has.

    • lemmyreader
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      Agreed. Self hosting email with JMAP support has become easier with Stalwart. More email clients with JMAP support would be nice.

        • @sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          I was reading that page and was just getting more and more confused and then eventually I realised it’s an alternative to IMAP. Pretty cool.

          • @acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            I didn’t know JMAP either. Apparently the authors found the complexity and stagnation of IMAP as well as inability to integrate with basic groupware such as CalDAV caused free e-mail clients to be dropped in favor of proprietary systems. Seems like a fair assessment and if JMAP solves that I’d be very pleased.

        • @Slotos@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          Please correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t this allow one to represent virtually any resource as a mail inbox/outbox with access through a generic mail app?

          I’m working with a specialized healthcare company right now, and this looks like a way to represent patient treatments data as an intuitive timeline of messages. With a local offline cache in case of outages. Security of local workstations is a weak point of course, but when is it not…

          • @dragonfly4933@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Yes, but that is always possible with most protocols, including imap.

            Take a look a FUSE and you will see all the creative things people have done with filesystems. Or DNS, lots of fun things have been done with that also.