White House urges developers to dump C and C++::Biden administration calls for developers to embrace memory-safe programing languages and move away from those that cause buffer overflows and other memory access vulnerabilities.

  • hagelslager@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Such as? (Non-programmer here, so I don’t know the ins and outs of programming languages.)

    • ben@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Zig and Rust come to mind, at least for replacements for low level languages.

      • scharf_2x40@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Isn’t that only microsoft exclusive and closed source? Also does compiling it really yield the same speed as C, it is garbage collected isn’t it?

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Was always possible to compile+run C# on Linux using the Mono project. Until Microsoft “bought them out” and created .NET Core, a cross platform version of .NET that MS now encourages people to use instead…

          Microsoft’s new linux compile tools rub me the wrong way slightly, with the telemetry that’s opt-in by default.

          Mono is still extremely valuable for older .NET Framework apps under WINE though, way easier to setup compared to the official installers from what i’ve experienced.

          No idea how compiled C# compares to C…

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Rust is the main one for the kind of code that’s typically written in C++. Most memory-safe languages make big compromises on performance, but Rust code tends to run about as fast as comparable C++ code.