• Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Btw you can do it also in Germany more or less.

    I believe it’s possible also in France .

    Edit: don’t want to insult anyone, I was just curious, nothing else.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yes, those are countries, not single states within a country. Different things.

      edit: ya’ll are acting so fucking weird in this comment thread. Jesus Christ I don’t even give a shit about the size of America or the US/EU pissing contest, I was merely and correctly pointing out the non-equivalence of the items being compared. Holy shit get a fucking life if you give two shits about the topic itself, goddamn. The hate boner some of you have for one country or another to the point of spite downvoting and intentionally misinterpreting shit is fucking ridiculous.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          New York to Hawaii can be a 13 hour flight depending on the Island you wanna land on. Alaska to Miami is similar and even drivable. Fairbanks to Miami is a brisk 77 hour drive.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          So is Réunion. Shall we count the time to take a boat to the island or just a flight?

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, how is this relevant? The point is they were comparing the length of time to cross a single American state to the time to cross an entire country, which are two different things. Driving through Texas isn’t equivalent to driving through Germany, it’s equivalent to driving through Bavaria.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            It is because most of the EU participates in an agreement without hard borders and is united by a larger entity that collects taxes and holds elections in its states/countries.

            The degree of federalism is higher in the USA than Europeans think it is. After all, each American state has at least one army.

            • Vespair@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Ah, in that case, no, you’re still wrong and we are not anything like the EU, not really. The of autonomy and sovereignty each member of the EU has is vastly different, and mostly vastly greater, than that of each of the individual states of America. Again, the correct equivalence isn’t America = EU, it’s America = Germany and Texas = Bavaria. Hope that helps.

                • Vespair@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Okay, so tell me then which of these you believe:

                  That the EU as a whole should only have one singular seat in the UN, NATO, and other similar organizations,

                  Or that every American state should have their own seat in the UN, NATO, and others?

      • Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        About your edit, that’s why I added the disclaimer on my first comment lol. I fully knew it would degenerate in a biggest dick contest and wanted to avoid being part of it.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I sincerely wish I had your wisdom and foresight. I just can’t imagine caring the way these people seem to care.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      For comparison, Bellingham, WA to Key West, FL. Same country, 2 days without stops.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      In addition to the other comment about it being a single state within the US, we’re also talking about roughly 1500-1600 kilometers in the Texas map. It would mostly be 70-75mph (120kph) highways the whole way.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      My question is how much of that is highway travel and/or straight? In the Texas map most of that travel will be highways at 80mph. I know Germany has the autobahn but living in Colombia has made me suspicious of long travel times which actually have short distances traveled since this country is very mountainous and I don’t think a straight road exists here.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        1/3 to 1/2 of the Texas trip will be interstate highways. The rest is mixed bag of divided highways with at grade crossings and two lane highways.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nearly all of it is Autobahn. It is basically just road work slowing you down and even that is not too bad.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Just for funsies I looked it up and Miami FL to Seattle WA is a 48 hour drive. Longest I found within the continental US upon a quick googling of recognizable cities.

      • Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        As stated in other comments I don’t care about dimensions, I wanted to share just a trivia and not spark a dumb contest (spoiler, it did not work)

      • bort@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, but you aren’t driving that fast in Germany

        *confused autobahn noises*

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If the Texas Trip is near the speed of the German trip, it is likely that the German trip isn’t taking place on the Autobahn.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Since we are doing whole countries, you can drive for 138 hours from Ruasia and still be in Russia:

      I can’t even zoom out enough.

      EDIT: you can drive in Russia without leaving it for 161 hours:

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yep, I cannot comprehend how there is so much space allocated to so few people and they still drown in one fucking housing crisis after another.

    If you are going to gobble up that much space for yourselves on this planet that we all share, stop fucking around and put it to good use!

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 months ago

      The housing crisis has zero to do with available space, except that in the hubs of industry, like silicon valley, there are more people wanting to live there than there’s space. That’s not true across the country.

      But no one is going to build a house in the middle of nowhere to help with housing because (a) hardly anyone wants to live in the middle of nowhere, away from all the jobs, and (b) the people building housing are motivated to get as much money as they can.

      We as a society could 100% solve the housing crisis, but it involves socialism, not capitalism, which a lot of Americans still have a problem with. The solution isn’t constrained by space, which the US has tons of.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        It wouldn’t even be that much socialism. Just a smidgen of housing regulations and zoning. Limit corporate ownership and rental profiteering, like any responsible capitalist democracy should with any industry.

        The problem is that an entire generation of homeowners wanted to ride the wave of residential deregulation like a fly on a windshield. Wheeee look at our property values skyrocket! We can retire on the capital gains alone! Fuck the next generation, what did they ever do for us?

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m all for the socialism, but could we also get the homestead act back? Free land and a grant to build a house if we’re willing to go rural as fuck and grow our own food. Maybe combine with eco friendly stuff. Have to build a cob house, must use ecologically safe farming techniques.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      People want to live next to people, and in specific areas. You can buy a nice house in bumfuck nowhere for cheap, or you can get an apartment in Austin for much more.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        As a transplant Bumfuckian for well over a decade now, no you can’t. It’s only cheap if you’re bringing your income or savings account from a non-bumfuck region.

    • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are you suggesting that more people should live in Texas? I don’t think this is the humanitarian viewpoint that you seem to think it is lol.

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m saying that people should live in geographic place that is Texas, not necessarily in the political construct that is Texas. Because I wouldn’t want to live in the latter either.

        • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t even know if I agree with that, it’s mostly desert or at the very least incredibly arid. It’ll end up being even worse than Southern California or Nevada, massive amounts of people pulling water from an aquifer too small to sustain them.

          People need to live in areas that have the resources to support them.

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nothing. I didn’t say it was, did I? I just said that the US has an awful lot of space on this planet that is home to all of us and still can’t manage to house people.

        Come to think of it, I said everything besides space was the issue, didn’t I?

  • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    7 months ago

    Texas is about the size of France you daft cunts. You just can’t drive there quicker because your infrastructure is so fucked 😂

    A French person takes the high speed train lmao

  • zerofk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pff, with traffic jams you can do that without ever leaving Brussels.

  • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    7 months ago

    And I bet it was all filler content and shitty roaming monster encounters. Open world design has gone too far!

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    7 months ago

    Here in the UK I could spend 13 hours on the M25 and would have only gone four junctions. The American mind cannot comprehend this.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can do the same thing a few different ways on I-40. For real along a stretch in New Mexico and Texas, there’s very little between Santa Rosa and Amarillo. You can also do it here on the east coast, if you do about 40 laps of Raleigh, 25 if one of those hours is between 5 and 6 pm.

    • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I, a German, am also struggling with travel times/distances in Britain.

      Me: (looks at map) I should be there in 1h tops.

      Hours pass…

      Me: I’m only half way there? WTF!

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      We have that in Texas too.

      There are millions of cars in the Austin area, and at any given time all of them are on Mopac.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To be fair, this Finnish trip is a solid 70 km shorter than the Texas trip, Google is just predicting it will take you longer.

      The east-west trip in Texas from Orange to El Paso is 1380 km, but only takes about 12.5 hours because a big chunk of the highway has an 80 mph (130 kph) speed limit

      • olutukko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        But the finnish trip is 1387 km, from orange to el paso trough san antonio 1373 km. So the finnish fastest route is longer in length too. But yeah we don’t have as fast highways whicg makes the trip way longer in time

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure, but really from the Louisiana border to the New Mexico border along that route is 1419 km. This morning it says that’ll take just over 13 hours because you’d hit rush hour traffic in Houston

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yup. And Norway is even longer if for some reason that’s not enough. In the UK you can also make a 1000+ km trip from north to south, same in France, Italy, Germany or Ukraine. In Turkey you can even leave Europe, drive 12 more hours and still be in Turkey.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 months ago

        Like so many things we Americans get bitched at for saying, it’s because that’s what the Brits used to call it.

        A British man named John Cassell sold a brand of petroleum-based fuel trademarked as Cazeline. This eventually became Gazeline and then genericized as gasoline, shortened to “gas.”

        One could ask why only “gasoline” is called “petrol” elsewhere in the world when several other fuels such as kerosene and diesel are also petroleum-based. Why isn’t diesel also called “petrol?”

        • TwoCubed@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The problem with “gas” is, that it’s a state of matter. Usually the word gas is used for natural gas that you’d use in a gas stove. Some vehicles are even upgraded with an actual gas tank, making it double confusing.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah wait hold up I’m in the US where we CALL IT THAT and mine says fuel

        Even though it knows I have an EV, which makes it double funny

        Edit: funnier - it shows as “gas” in Android Auto but “fuel” on maps when not in AA. Both know I’m an EV and show “charging stations” and not “gas stations”

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      americans love to completely fucking forget the nordics exist, as if we’re not more rural than large parts of the US lmao, and yet we’re able to have trains and other good things.

      I think american conservatives just hate our existence for proving their shitty opinions wrong

      • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Funny, we have similar distances in India it seems but with travel times on Google Maps mentioned in days instead of hours thanks to our excellent roads

        • ForgottenUsername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Everything’s bigger in Texas, except WA that shit is huge…!

          Initially I did Kununurra to Eucla which is approx 40hrs, but you can do it in 38 hrs if you go through the territory and SA. In the efforts of keeping things fair and saying in the same state such as the OP, Esperance seemed to prove the point. There’s defs longer commutes, but shy of triple seemed to be enough to prove a point.

          PS love the username

          • dumbass@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Kununurra to Eucla is 40 hours, suprisingly it’s 3 hours quicker to go through northern territory and south Australia.

            Cheers, thought I’d let them know who they’re arguing with.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I mean in fairness Australia is a whole ass country

        Edit: today I learned Australia also has states :)

        • ForgottenUsername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’ve lost me the USA is a country as well.?

          In Aus, we have a state called Western Australia (we’re really imaginative with naming,) and its friggin huge…! (Pictured)

          Approx 2.6 million km2 Or approx 1 million sq freedom units

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you think that Australia is huge, you should play with navigation in Russia.

    • Rogers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same goes for Alaska/Canada/Russia/China. This meme must have been made by stereotypical self centered texan lmao

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Not even the longest route within one state by a long shot:

    As usual, California beats Texas

  • cerothem@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 months ago

    All these guys are posting crossing their whole country, but as Texas is one state, it’s fair to say that’s the same as a province.

    Shared route From Windsor, Ontario to Kenora, Ontario via ON-401 E.

    23 hr 6 min (2,190 km) For the best route in current traffic visit https://maps.app.goo.gl/Jmm9TmKVu79bTANq5

    Staying only within Ontario, Canada it takes almost one full day of literally non stop driving.

    • Eranziel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Best I can find in Canada is in BC. I think you could get longer distances in a few other provinces, but the issue is a lack of roads/destinations in the northern corners, haha.

      • cerothem@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        That is a respectable size and to you sir I can only say what any man can say in this situation.

        It’s not about the size, but how you use it. ;-)

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Someone travelling from Windsor would almost certainly take the shorter 17hr trip through the states. Still a long one.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The 51st state is part of the USA, that’s the whole point of this post. The Euros just can’t grasp the size.

      I guess I missed the /s

      Did no one get the 51st state joke…

      • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Your geography lesson for today is (Google) mapping a route from Brest to Menton (France) and compare it to the route posted by OP.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Your history lesson for today is looking up when Canada became the 51st state…and realize I was being sarcastic.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          But that’s crossing a country. Texas is a state. Going from San Diego to Portland, Maine is ~46 hours, and that’s probably not the longest route. There’s also Alaska and Hawaii (no direct roads to the contiguous 48 states), and Florida, that’s just a pretty long route off the top of my head.