For a long time, I thought of the blockchain as almost synonymous with cryptocurrencies, so as I saw stuff like “Odyssey” and “lbry” appearing and being “based on the blockchain”, my first thought was that it was another crypto scam. Then, I just got reminded of it and started looking more into it, and it just seemed like regular torrenting. For example, what’s the big innovation separating Odyssey from Peertube, which is also decentralized and also uses P2P? And what part of it does the blockchain really play, that couldn’t be done with regular P2P? More generally, and looking at the futur, does the blockchain offer new possibilities that the fediverse or pre-existing protocols don’t have?

  • phillaholic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe this is my “too old for this shit” moment, but this all just sounds like convoluted non-sense that’s never going to go anywhere. We still have SMS and ATMs that run XP.

    • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      surprisingly small hardware is needed to sign a message. though I do agree that we are still a bit early for workable end-user use cases. People really dont care what the database or app server is, they just want it to work and raw dogging some public node is just a bit much for people, i dont blame them.

      more packaged solutions are under development, these will be more like a proper application with the differences of a chain being abstracted by the provider

      things like sms, what if i told you SMS would be fine with this, so would smoke signals