• @ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    2184 months ago

    See your problem is you’re editing the code until it passes the tests. It’s way easier if you edit the tests until it passes the code.

    • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      374 months ago

      Can’t tell if you are joking. I know a lot of junior developers who think this is a legitimate solution.

      • Johanno
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        I hate groovy, gradle and Jenkins!

        I don’t know if sth. Else is better but I can confirm that shit is horrific

          • Johanno
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            Horrible scripting language. Even worse than python. Close to Javascript

            • @juicy@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              If you don’t think Python is a good scripting language, what is a good scripting language in your opinion? Bourne Shell? VBScript? PHP?

              • Johanno
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                I like python and if you use typing it is awesome.

                I like kotlin script too. But normal languages are better than scripting languages usually.

                • @souperk@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Typing in python leaves a lot to be desired… Being looking at peps for quite some time, but it’s really hard for the language to make progress without breaking compatibility.

                  Hopefully at some point MOJO becomes mature enough to use in a professional setting.

  • Pxtl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    DevOps is bad because for some reason we’ve decided to invent new programming languages that you can’t debug locally and so you have to keep pushing commits to the pipeline server. It’s bullshit.

    “Why do you write all your pipelines as shell scripts and then wrap them in yaml at the very end”?

    Because then I can run them locally quickly and test individual components of them instead of “edit, commit, push, wait 10 minutes, read error message, repeat”.

    • @biribiri11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      FWIW, gitlab-runner exec and earthly exist for running tests locally, with others things like nektos/act for GHA as a 3rd party solution. I’ll never get used to yaml, though, all my pipelines are mostly shell scripts. Using a markup language as a programming language was definitely one of the decisions of all time.

      • @kugiyasan
        link
        24 months ago

        Gitlab-runner exec and act are great tools, but this goes out of the window as soon as the cloud hosting service is a little less intelligent (looking at you, azure DevOps, who removed the hack that let pipeline run locally in 2019)

        • @biribiri11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          That’s why earthly exists. Now you can run your pipeline on a container with a “familiar syntax” inside another container with a “familiar syntax” inside of a “reproducible, easy-to-use” VM provisioned on top of probably KVM, as Torvalds intended

    • @kometes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      My build environment has 3 jillion unneeded builds going. I am lucky to get 2 build failures in a single day.

  • @beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    284 months ago

    Local tests are less shameful. Imagine if you had a Red X online for every compiler or syntax error whilst developing.

    So it is.

  • Howdy
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    As a fellow jenkins miner. I know this red (x) all too well.