I know this is typical for the US so this is more for US people to respond to. I wouldn’t say that it is the best system for work, just wondering about the disconnect.

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps. But only the last 2-4 years. No student below high school should have homework (there is research to back this up). And they can do it in study hall, not necessarily at home. College courses have like half the class time, so professors hit the hard parts and expect students to read and get the rest on their own.

      • JetpackJackson@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No student below high school should have homework (there is research to back this up).

        Might I ask what research? Could you give me a source or two? I’m rather intrigued by this

      • ShadyOstrich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of schools are going to this model now, at least in Texas around me. Texas requires interventions if kids fail the STAAR (the statewide test they take that shows they know the material they’ve learned during the school year) so a lot of schools have built in an intervention period (or whatever the campus calls it) to give those kids the intervention time. My kid doesn’t need intervention so they just do their homework during that time. They can sign up to go to certain teachers to get help, too. And a lot of schools/teachers have gotten away from assigning homework, since it just punishes the kids who don’t have support st home.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but also: In a lot of professions you have a lot of freedom regarding when you work. I’m browsing lemmy now, and getting to work at around 10, but I worked late on Friday, and I’m probably going to be answering some mails after dinner today.

        I think this is just going to become more common: Not paying people for for the time they are at work, but rather for the job they do. That means that if you prefer to work 9-5, thats fine, but if you prefer to leave earlier or start later, and get some of your work done in the afternoon/weekends, thats also fine, as long as you get the job done.

        I very much enjoy having that freedom. Even though it means I may be expected to pull longer days every now and then, it also means nobody questions me for leaving early when the weather is nice.

    • Baylahoo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess that’s another suspect of eating away people’s time. If university takes more than 8 hours then it is also in question. If people want to be subjected to work outside of their 8 hour window, they should be allowed. Forcing this is crazy.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing about university “requiring” people to work more than 8 hours is this: It’s not a human right to become a system architect, physicist or engineer. Universities typically don’t require more than 8 hours per day, but a lot of studies in practice require more than 8 hours if you want to be able to get through them. Relaxing the requirements for passing a degree would mean less competent professionals leaving the universities, and I don’t think anyone getting on a plane or going into surgery wants that.