• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Eh? Their bog standard device cost is usually pretty on par. And Apple definitely isn’t charging you double.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Which one is bog standard? Samsung has over 12 different models on production that range from 150$ to 1900$, including two models with folding screens. Apple has 3 4 almost identical phones, they’re all overpriced hardware.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          The hardware is overpriced, absolutely. But it’s also typically better than Samsung.

          By big standard I mean their “low end” device. The comparable Samsung of each generation is usually within ~$200 of the Apple model.

          • miridius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Better? The Apple hardware is always significantly worse than competition in the same price class. Most of the price of an iPhone goes to their excessive marketing and record profits, so they have to cut costs on hardware

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You mean to say that the accidentally bendy phone is better than the actually foldable phone? Or that the accidentally bendy tablet is better than the tablet that is almost 20% larger, equally thin but somehow doesn’t bend?