• macrocephalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you watch ads instead of paying a modest fee to remove them then you’re a clown. Companies do need to make money for the services they provide, I just disagree with the amount.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Modest?” $14 a month? $5 would be modest. I literally pay less for whole as streaming services.

        • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If you watch enough youtube per month to see an hour of ads and you can’t block ads for some reason, you may actually be losing time/money by not paying the subscription. That said, there are ad blockers for almost every platform so it shouldn’t be too difficult to find one that works.

            • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That was my comment about the amount that should be charged. I’ll happily pay $5/mo, but not $15. I’m happy to pay for services, just not the amount that many want to charge.

      • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        They make enough off of all my data they collect. I’m not paying them a cent for anything and I’m not watching a single ad. If you want to watch ads for shareholders, you are most definitely a clown.

    • slimarev92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ads are bad (I agree).

      Paying for things is bad.

      Then what’s left? YouTube should somehow be ad free and free of cost for the user forever and ever? Who’s gonna pay for the enormous costs of operating the service?

      People are going to start yelling at me about capitalism and enshitiffication. Both of which cause problems, but what do you propose here? Magic?

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Youtube might be the literal most valuable site in my life, up there with Wikipedia and search engines.

      A large part of my payment also goes to the channels I view.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Really? I watch very little Youtube, so I’d rather not use it than pay $10+ for it. I’m currently able to block ads, so I’ll watch as long as that’s an option.

          • Veneroso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Unpopular opinion, but I also use YouTube almost exclusively.

            It has my podcasts, my political livestreamers, late night shows, and multiple channels that I follow.

            I also enjoy YouTube music as well.

            I bought a full year, which lowers the price a little.