Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, sent a letter to colleagues informing them of his intent to file the resolution, which would kickstart what’s traditionally a cumbersome amendment process.

“This amendment will do what SCOTUS failed to do — prioritize our democracy,” Morelle said in a statement to AP.

  • kn33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the only way to change that. I don’t have much hope that it’ll pass, though.

          • APassenger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            5 months ago

            He’s too virtuous. He hasn’t processed that anything he does is legal.

            So he leads be example. Or something.

            Maybe someone should explain it to him before 4 PM?

            • paddirn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              29
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It feels so Game of Thrones-ish. Democrats are going to act all high and mighty and virtuous, while Republicans are just going to be like Cersei Lannister, “Is this meant to be your shield, Lord Stark? A piece of paper?” Republicans will run them through and sleep well knowing they won, without a guilty conscience. The President should be acting now to protect the country, not waiting for the wolves to get into the hen house and then wringing their hands that there was nothing they could do about it.

              • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s pretty much it. Republicans are bring out the spiked maces and Dems are just trying to fisticuff they’re way out of it. Because virtue.

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Not even fisticuffs. They’re filing a motion to discourage mace spikes over a certain length.

                  Pending the approval of some unelected clerk rando with only symbolic authority, of course.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Being free from the consequences of your actions does not give you absolute power and authority. He can’t fire them, because he never had that power. What he can do is have them swatted and kill them in official capacity, although he can still be impeached.

          • APassenger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Trump signed an executive order and made much of the executive branch fire-able. Go far enough and that influence can turn into control over other parts of the government.

            There’s a path to effective termination.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Nah, that one only works because the executive branch belongs to the president. It’s kind of like my boss saying there’s a new rule at my work and he can fire you at will from your work.

              It would be a really convenient way to go if it worked though…

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Them actively denying legislature on a whim would be time consuming and bring us closer to congress impeaching the justices and removing them.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the only legislative way to change that.

      There is a way that Biden could change that completely unilaterally, but he’s not going to do it.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Impeachment. Impeachment is easier, more direct, and since the justices can theoretically interpret the amendment any way they wish far more likely to be effective.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah they’ve already wiped their asses with the spirit of the Constitution. There are currently in rules for the but not for me mode. It’s still a good gesture.